toggle

AAPL Stock: 100.96 ( -0.83 )

Subscribe to this page now.

National Federation of the Blind sues Uber over refused rides, abuses

09/13, 1:08pm

One complaint alleged service dog transported in trunk of driver's car

Ride sharing service Uber is being sued by the California branch of the National Federation of the Blind for mistreatment of the disabled. The complaint, filed in the Northern California District Court, alleges refusal of rides to blind persons with service dogs, abandonment of blind travelers in harsh weather conditions, and cancellation fee being charged after being refusing to transport blind riders. Additionally, there is one report of a Uber ride share driver putting a service dog in the trunk of the car, with the driver refusing to pull over and rectify the situation when the passenger realized where the dog was riding.

more

T-Mobile suing Huawei over theft of items relating to testing robot

09/08, 6:07pm

Carrier claims Huawei built its own testing machine based on stolen information, parts

Wireless carrier T-Mobile USA has filed a lawsuit against Huawei, alleging that the Chinese phone manufacturer stole a number of trade secrets relating to the carrier's phone-testing robot. In the suit filed with a federal court on September 2, the company claims that employees of Huawei took pictures of T-Mobile's "Tappy" robot, attempted to steal components, and tried to sneak back into the testing facility in Washington after they were banned.

more

Aereo can't operate as cable company, appeals court denies request

08/21, 11:49pm

Startup will need to take the case district court if it wants to continue fighting

Aereo, the broadcasting startup that allowed users to rebroadcast and time-shift over-the-air (OTA) programming, appears to be running out of ways to stay alive. According to documents acquired by the Washington Post, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has denied the company's recent request to reconsider the case.

more

Uber allowed to resume services in Berlin after ban suspended

08/18, 1:59pm

Judge allows rideshare company to return to business, ban lasted only four days

Uber fans in Berlin can rejoice for the time being, as the company has been given the go-ahead to resume its UberPop and UberBlack services today for the time being. A judge from the Berlin Administrative Court suspended the municiple ban, allowing the ride-sharing service to return to business. There is no time frame on how long the suspension will last.

more

Court invalidates two Vringo patents, Google Adsense off the hook

08/15, 2:31pm

Previous rulings favoring Vringo nullified, revenue percentage payout killed

A long-standing court battle between Vringo's I/P Engine and Google is grinding to a halt in the Mountain View-base ad agency's favor. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit declared two patents of Vringo's invalid, nullifying a jury verdict that found the search engine giant and others liable for a total $30 million in damages plus a percentage of Google Adwords profits. The ruling is the latest in a string of verdicts calling into question the overall validity of software functionality patents over that of the code itself.

more

Google, Microsoft, others throw in with Facebook in NY privacy appeal

08/09, 9:55am

Amicus briefs filed with NY Supreme Court decry overly broad warrants

Facebook is battling the New York courts over what it says are overly-broad warrants to examine user profiles and data. Supporting the social media giant, Dropbox, Foursquare, Google, Kickstarter, LinkedIn, Meetup, Microsoft, Pinterest, Twitter, Tumblr, and Yelp have all filed amicus curae ("friend of the court") briefs with courts in support of the Facebook effort, complaining that services like Facebook are multi-faceted and require more granular warrants, rather than a sweeping motion to collect all data about a targeted user.

more

Judge upholds warrant, orders Microsoft to produce overseas emails

07/31, 6:43pm

Department of Justice warrant to obtain emails valid, judge gives Microsoft chance to appeal

A United States District Court judge ruled today that a warrant issued to Microsoft requesting emails stored in Dublin, Ireland is valid. The judge stated that the company must follow the order to produce emails involved in a criminal investigation, in spite of foreign law. The order was temporarily stayed to give Microsoft the opportunity to appeal through the Second United States Circuit Court of Appeals.

more

FISA Court judges ruling on surveillance reportedly own Verizon stock

07/28, 2:35pm

Report claims three judges in FISA Court bought Verizon stock in the last year

Judges sitting on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA Court) may not be entirely impartial, according to a report. A number of judges on FISA Court allegedly own stock in Verizon, one of the companies subject to NSA bulk surveillance orders issued by the court, with the report suggesting this could be considered as unethical behavior by judges in an important role.

more

Appeals court rejects Fox's attempt to use Aereo ruling against Dish

07/15, 4:21pm

Broadcasting company tried to use Aereo ruling to force a preliminary injunction

Days after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of broadcasting companies in the Aereo case, Fox Broadcasting attempted to use the judgment as fuel in a case against Dish Network. Stating that there were large similarities between the devices, Fox believed the defense Dish raised no longer held up. In an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the judges sitting on the case upheld the lower court's ruling against Fox, as the panel of judges failed to be convinced of the alleged connection.

more

Aereo asks court to allow it use of statutory content licenses

07/10, 7:58am

Joint letter suggests Aereo wants cable company-style licenses following Supreme Court decision

Aereo may have found a way to it to continue offering a service to subscribers with the key lying in the recent Supreme Court decision against the start-up. In a joint letter filed with the US District Court, the company claims that, since the Supreme Court ruled it operated as if it is a cable company, it should be eligible to the same statutory licenses cable companies use.

more

Aereo faces shutdown after Supreme Court ruling favors broadcasters

06/25, 11:38am

Cloud-based DVR service should pay licenses to broadcasters, rules Supreme Court

Aereo has lost its battle against broadcasters, after the US Supreme Court ruled against the start-up. In a 6-3 ruling, the court states the company violates copyright law by streaming recordings of TV shows to its subscribers, classifying the streams as "public performances" and so requires that Aereo pay content licenses to broadcasters for their programming.

more

Appeals Court kicks back Apple power adapter class-action settlement

05/01, 2:49am

Says fee paid to original attorney claimants too high, judge made appeal too difficult

A settlement agreed to by Apple and a pair of legal firms over early Magsafe adapters and their tendency to fray has been kicked back to a federal district court for reconsideration by the Ninth Circuit US Court of Appeals over concerns that the original judge had failed to properly safeguard the deal from "self-dealing" between the class counsel and Apple. The court also found fault with Judge James Ware's high barrier to appeal of the decision, requiring a $75,000 bond from objectors.

more

Jury asks questions of court, gets rebuffed in Apple-Samsung trial

04/30, 6:26pm

Judge says jury must work with the evidence given; supplies request granted

On the first full day of deliberations in the second Apple-Samsung trial, jurors have asked for two different things: some office supplies to help them in their work, and for additional evidence -- seemingly to help them decide motivations on the part of the CEOs of both Apple and Samsung. The former requests have been granted, but the latter requests were rebuffed by US District Court Judge Lucy Koh, who told the jury that they would have to work with what they already have.

more

Apple vs Samsung, Day 13: All over but the verdict

04/30, 3:25am

Samsung definitely didn't copy Apple's cool closing style

As reported earlier, it's all in the hands of jury now. The final day of the second Apple-Samsung trial consisted of two of the most contrasting closing arguments quite possibly ever seen in a courtroom: Samsung's mad dash to the finish line, a relay race of four lawyers, too many exhibits and not enough time; Apple's cool, relaxed and compelling storytelling, and a devilishly clever finale as its defensive closing argument offered multiple layers of meaning.

more

Aereo versus broadcast industry case heard before US Supreme Court

04/22, 2:57pm

Hearing will decide fate of Aereo, will also have effects on cloud file streaming

In what is likely to be the final stop between Internet over-the-air television streamer Aereo and essentially the entire broadcast industry allied against it, Aereo seems to be fighting an uphill battle. Today's hearing before the US Supreme Court found judges skeptical about Aereo's business model, calling it "based solely on circumventing legal prohibitions that you don't want to comply with."

more

Apple vs. Samsung, Day Three: Into the weeds of patents

04/08, 3:53am

Apple's case continues with engineer Deniau, experts Mowry and Snoeren

Over the weekend, Apple filed a notice with the court that it could wrap up its main presentation by tomorrow at the earliest, but expects to be done no later than Friday, barring any changes to Samsung's pattern of cross-examination. On Monday, patent expert Andrew Cockburn from New Zealand was summoned back to the witness stand for a scant 16 minutes of light cross-examination, followed by testimony from Apple engineer Thomas Deniau and a pair of additional patent experts.

more

US Supreme Court: Lexmark can be sued for bad DMCA claim

03/26, 2:03pm

Clone refill chip manufacturer allowed to seek redress for Lexmark actions

The Supreme Court of the US has ruled against Lexmark, allowing a company it filed a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) against erroneously to seek legal recompense. The unanimous ruling will allow chip manufacturer Static Control Components (SCC) to seek redress against Lexmark for tarnishing its business reputation, when Lexmark falsely induced consumers "to believe that [SCC] is engaged in illegal con­duct."

more

Dotcom defense stymied, NZ court rules against evidence disclosure

03/21, 7:55am

Supreme court finds lower ruling 'erroneous, greatly complicates defense

The New Zealand Supreme Court has ruled against Internet maven Kim Dotcom, declaring that US prosecutors did not need to pre-disclose evidence against him in a July extradition hearing. The appeals hearing ruled that the lower court was erroneous in its ruling that demanded disclosure of the evidence. A summary of the evidence has already been provided to Dotcom, and is sufficient for defense purposes at this stage, the judges ruled.

more

Economists argue in Apple's favor in e-book appeal court filing

03/05, 10:58pm

Original judge, DOJ misapplied antitrust law, 'ignored economic evidence'

Two economists from CalTech and NYU have filed an amicus curae ("friend of the court") brief that makes powerful arguments for a reversal of the verdict in the original bench trial overseen by Judge Denise Cote. Across more than 30 pages, they tell the appeals court that fundamental concepts of antitrust law and crucial economic evidence and reasoning were "disregarded" by the judge.

more

Court rejects Google's request to hold anti-Islamic video removal

03/01, 4:10pm

Attempts to keep video up as larger appeal is sought fails

After a ruling on February 26 in which the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a previous decision and ordered a YouTube video removed, Google's appeal to appear before a larger panel review has been denied. On Friday, the Ninth Circuit Court rejected Google's request to put the video's removal on hold as the case continued.

more

Apple, Samsung mediation talks fail, but both sides to keep talking

02/22, 7:56pm

CEOs, top lawyers met in early February, but could not come to agreement

Ahead of the second patent trial between Apple and Samsung scheduled for March 31 -- which covers a completely different set of patents and is not an appeal of the first trial, which Apple won last year -- the two companies are said to be making efforts at settling their differences rather than going to trial. Thus far -- as before, ahead of the first trial -- the negotiations have not resulted in an agreement, but in a court filing, both companies said they were willing to keep talking.

more

Court: Antitrust monitor Bromwich stays, but with more limitations

02/10, 7:27pm

Apple had wanted monitor suspended while appeal goes forward

Apple on Monday lost its bid to halt or replace court-appointed antitrust monitor Michael Bromwich, a friend of trial Judge Denise Cote which the company had strenuously objected to for a variety of reasons. The court, while rejecting Apple's claim that Bromwich's "overreaching" and obnoxious behavior was causing the company "irreparable harm," did set stronger limits on Bromwich's activities -- curtailing most of what Apple had objected to.

more

Federal court grants injunction against Aio Wireless

02/09, 2:40pm

Judge finds Aio Wireless color choice infringes trademark

The case for the use of the color magenta in the mobile marketplace filed by T-Mobile against Aio Wireless, an AT&T subsidiary, has dealt a blow to the smaller no-contract carrier by a federal court. An injunction has been granted in favor of T-Mobile which restricts Aio from further use of the color.

more

Secret surveillance court accepts two of Obama's NSA metadata reforms

02/07, 1:25pm

Agrees to measures requiring court approval for NSA metadata searches

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has given its approval to changes President Barack Obama has requested as part of a surveillance reforms speech last month. Two measures in the reforms have been accepted by the court, which will affect the way the National Security Agency (NSA) searches its phone records database in the future.

more

Samsung, Apple argue in court over product sales injunctions

01/30, 9:01pm

Apple says bans are the price Samsung has to pay for copying

Apple and Samsung were in court on Thursday in front of US District Court Judge Lucy Koh, with the former arguing that its successful verdicts against Samsung entitles it to sales bans on the affected products (even though none of them are still offered for sale). Samsung, meanwhile, protested that the injunctions would "create fear and uncertainty" among suppliers, since Apple could seek bans on current and future products as well.

more

Judge: Apple's objections prove need for e-book antitrust monitor

01/16, 6:51pm

Logic-defying ruling may inadvertently aid Apple's appeal

Following on from an initial ruling on Monday that ignored Apple's objections, US Federal Judge Denise Cote reinterated her denial of Apple's request for either suspension of a court-appointed antitrust monitor during appeal or at least the replacement of former DOJ Inspector General Michael Bromwich as the monitor in a 64-page ruling. "If anything, Apple's reaction to the existence of a monitorship underscores the wisdom of its imposition," she wrote.

more

Apple formally requests removal of Bromwich as court enforcer

01/08, 2:14am

Controversial 'monitor' shows himself to be biased, Apple argues

Apple has filed a formal request with the same judge that appointed the antitrust compliance monitor to have him removed, citing a wide range of complaints and accusations of overreach -- including the monitor's own recent declarations, which the company says prove a pre-existing bias. Former DOJ Inspector General Michael Bromwich was a controversial choice for the post due to his lack of antitrust experience and personal relationship with the judge, among other problems and conflicts of interest.

more

Samsung handed another setback in German SEP patent case

11/23, 12:19am

Case against Apple suspended while validity of Samsung patent decided

Just hours after a US jury restored more than half of the set-aside portion of damages from the first Apple vs Samsung trial, a separate case in Germany has been suspended because the court believes that the patent Samsung is attempting to sue Apple over is invalid. The matter will be put on hold until the Federal Patent Court of Germany can determine it. Even if the patent is eventually found valid, Apple will face no injunction over its use, since it is a standards-essential patent (SEP).

more

Judge tosses four of five Apple patents for 'lost profit' damages

11/15, 7:22pm

Original jury had awarded Apple $114 million for the patents

Even as Apple senior executive Phil Schiller was telling the jury that Samsung's copying and infringement of Apple patents had hurt the reputation of the company, presiding US District Court Judge Lucy Koh ruled on Friday that Apple can't pursue damages due to lost profits on four of the five patents-in-suit. While "lost profits" is only a portion of the damages that can be awarded, the original jury in the first trial assigned around $114 million to Apple for the patents in question, leaving the company more likely to get less overall.

more

Court rules Deutsche Telekom cannot throttle home broadband services

10/30, 2:28pm

Plan to cap speeds on fixed broadband connections stopped by German court

A court in Germany has ruled that Deutsche Telekom cannot throttle its home broadband service to a lower speed when a customer exceeds data allocations on a flat-rate package. Plans due to come into force in 2016 that would force customers down to a significantly slower connection than one they had originally paid for once they reach a data limit can no longer take place.

more

Tokyo court censors results from Google autocomplete

04/16, 7:01am

Results of searches continue to link man to criminal acts

A Japanese court has ordered Google to censor terms used in autocomplete that relate to one specific person. The ruling by the Tokyo District Court also awarded the unknown person 300,000 yen ($3,100) for the "mental anguish" endured, caused by the association of his name with various criminal acts in autocomplete-derived searches.

more

UK Court of Appeal orders Apple to pay Samsung legal costs

11/11, 4:03pm

Payment under 'indemnity' basis due to 'false and misleading' information

Apple has been ordered to pay Samsung's costs in its UK legal battle. The Court of Appeal made the order under an "indemnity basis," typically higher than the normal "standard" basis of legal costs, due to the "false and misleading" information placed by Apple in the first court-ordered statement on its website.

more

Apple places second attempt at 'apology' statement online

11/04, 10:56am

Toned-down statement in response to UK Court order

Apple has updated its website in order to follow a court ruling for a second time. After the UK Court of Appeal attacked the original attempt, deeming it non-compliant, Apple has put another notice up for UK-based website viewers. While toned down from the original attacking-style of the first version, the new statement forces users to scroll down in order to see it in the first place.

more

First Apple ''apology'' statement published in UK newspaper

11/02, 10:29am

Published statement toned down from non-compliant text

Apple has published its first printed "apology" statement, as mandated by the UK Court of Appeal. The statement appears at the bottom of page five of The Guardian, and is seemingly more restrained in its wording compared to the version that appeared on its website, which has since been removed from view.

more

UK court rules Apple's Samsung statement non-compliant

11/01, 12:14pm

Apple to publish amended statement within 48 hours

Apple has been attacked by the UK Court of Appeal over how the company worded its acknowledgment that Samsung did not infringe on iPad design patents. The original statement was considered not to be compliant with the court order, and Apple has been instructed to republish a more appropriate statement on its website.

more

Apple adds link to Samsung judgement on UK site

10/26, 6:41am

Published judgement includes coolness comments

Apple has updated its website to comply with a court order in the UK. A small link at the bottom of apple.com/uk titled "Samsung/Apple UK judgement" takes visitors to a seperate page, explaining that the High Courty of Justice of England and Wales found the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9, and Tab 7.7 do not infringe one of Apple's design patents.

more

Korean court bans iPhone 4, iPad 2, Galaxy Nexus, Galaxy Tab

08/24, 12:09am

Companies awarded small damages

A South Korean court has ruled that both Apple and Samsung are guilty of patent infringement, bringing an end to two lawsuits filed last year. A three-judge panel outlined the split decision, which finds Apple guilty of infringing two Samsung patents and, conversely, Samsung has been found guilty of infringing one Apple patent. Both companies will be affected by product injunctions, though the monetary damage awards are minuscule.

more

Court filings show Google's motivations behind book scanning

08/06, 11:59pm

Documents from 2004 show primary goal of making money

In a court filing by writer's advocate group The Authors Guild, the motivation for Google's nearly decade-long scanning of books and documents was revealed to be contrary to its stated purpose. Rather than creating a massive "card catalog" of out-of-print books, the internal Google documents show that the primary goal of the scanning was making money.

more

Apple moves for harsh judgement sanctions against Samsung

08/02, 7:05pm

'Severe misconduct' and past bad behavior over design patents

Saying "Samsung apparently believes that it is above the law, and that it -- not this Court -- should decide what evidence the jury should see," Apple has petitioned the US District Court hearing its case against Samsung to impose a severe sanction on the South Korean smartphone maker for its stunt of releasing to the press (with an obvious intent of influencing the jury) evidence that was barred from the trial for being inaccurate.

more

Judge: Samsung can't show Sony-like Apple iPhone prototype

07/30, 8:13pm

Latest in string of Samsung requests denied by judge

Samsung saw yet another procedural setback today at the opening of its trial against Apple in US District Court in San Francisco. An attempt by Samsung to frame an early iPhone prototype labeled "Jony" by Apple designers as copied from Sony -- thereby implying that stealing designs is okay if others do it also -- has been quashed. Samsung will not be permitted to present exhibits to the jury that allege Apple was inspired by Sony. Apple produced design documents from an earlier prototype also resembling the iPhone 4 design but without the Sony influence, demonstrating to the judge that the iPhone design process was done completely in-house.

more

Apple versus Samsung jury to be told of evidence destruction

07/25, 8:52pm

Samsung email server automatically deletes emails after two weeks

Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal entered an order potentially complicating Samsung's legal battle against Apple in Judge Lucy Koh's court next week. The jury will receive a notification that informs them that Samsung failed to comply with its obligations to preserve e-mail evidence, and jurors maybut don't have topresume that relevant evidence supporting Apple's claims was destroyed.

more

Judge deals Samsung procedural blows in Apple hearing

07/19, 12:33am

Multiple issues addressed; Apple must further winnow issues

US District Court Judge Lucy Koh spend her afternoon dealing with some details of the upcoming Samsung and Apple intellectual property patent trial. In rulings that most favored Apple, Koh ruled that Steve Jobs' statements to his biographer were an "inadmissible distraction," and likewise limited discussion of Apple's Chinese manufacturing efforts to exclude any reports of human rights issues.

more

Samsung wins expedited Galaxy Nexus injunction hearing

07/13, 10:10pm

Apple response terse, groups Samsung with pirates, counterfeiters

Samsung's request to expedite its appeal of the preliminary injunction against the Galaxy Nexus phone has been granted in the US Court of Appeals. Samsung has until July 16 to file its court brief starting the process. Apple has until July 30 to respond to Samsung's filing, with final comments due on August 6. Additionally, Apple's response to the temporary stay on the sales injunction of the Galaxy Nexus was accepted by the court on time, and will be considered.

more

Appeals court finds bank liable for $588,000 ACH theft

07/06, 7:30pm

Security used 'commercially unreasonable,' didn't meet federal standards

The US Federal Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has reversed a lower court's decision, and found Ocean Bank (now People's United) at fault for a $588,000 "virtual robbery" in 2008 against Sandord, ME-based Patco Construction Company. Calling the bank's security systems "commercially unreasonable," the Boston-based appeals court returned some specific aspects back to the original court and judge for review, but is encouraging both parties to settle the matter out of court.

more

Comcast handed victory in adult video 'John Doe' case

06/23, 10:04pm

Overbroad subpoenas quashed, civil case closed

As previously reported, Internet service provider Comcast attempted to quash "John Doe" subpoenas in an adult video pirating case. The company had argued that the case was about "shaking down" its customers and pushing for settlements out of the 264 potential infringers rather than any interest in actually stopping the piracy. The company has now been handed a victory in court, as Judge Gary Feinerman ruled that Comcast was not in contempt of court for ignoring subpoenas from four adult video companies. The civil case was also dismissed.

more

Apple counter-sues HTC for FRAND, antitrust violations

06/22, 7:20pm

Similar to FRAND suits against Motorola, Samsung

Thursday afternoon, Apple filed a lawsuit charging antitrust claims and "fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory" (FRAND) abuse on standards-essential patents against rival smartphone maker HTC in a Virginia court. The counterclaim, which involves patents covering the "4G" LTE protocol, comes in the middle of an ITC investigation into Apple filed by HTC. The patents have been described by HTC itself as standards-essential in its complaint against Apple last summer, and claimed in court that Apple devices contain baseband chips that implement the LTE standard, thus proving the standards-essential nature of the HTC-held patent in question.

more

Judge affirms Netflix subject to ADA guidelines

06/22, 6:40pm

Netflix argued online-only presence gave it an exemption

On Tuesday, US District Court Judge Michael Posnor decreed that Netflix and other public online services are subject to provisions of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). This decision could require Internet-streamed media to include accommodations for the deaf or blind, such as captions or descriptive text. The judge wasn't hearing the case proper, but was ruling on a motion to dismiss by Netflix, who argued that it wasn't accountable to ADA guidance due to the streaming service's online-only presence.

more

Motorola, Apple resume patent skirmish in Posner's court

06/20, 9:30pm

Judge: 'Great, that's all we need, new suits'

Judge Richard A. Posner heard the preliminary injunction arguments from both Apple and Motorola on why each should get an injunction against the other's infringing technology in his Chicago courtroom Wednesday morning. No ruling was offered -- the two-hour hearing was used to receive clarifications on briefs filed by Motorola and Apple since Posner resurrected the trial after dismissing it last week, but product sales injunctions seem unlikely.

more

Ruling in Google versus Oracle: APIs are not copyrightable

05/31, 9:52pm

41-page brief first ruling of its kind

Further announcements have come from Judge William Alsup's courtroom in the Google versus Oracle case today. The judge has decreed programming APIs to be non-copyrightable. The ruling comes in accordance with existing copyright law declaring "a utilitarian and functional set of symbols, each to carry out a pre-assigned function" non-copyrightable under Section 102(b) of the Copyright Act. Alsup's court is the first court, district or appeals, to have specifically addressed the separate matter of API copyrightability, instead of the complete codebase copyrightability issue.

more

Google files for mistrial in ongoing Oracle court saga [U]

05/09, 7:45pm

Oracle wants judge to rule on 'fair use' as a matter of law

[Update: judge denies Oracle motion, reduces Google liability] As expected, Google has petitioned Judge William Alsop for a mistrial following the jury's refusal to rule on a crucial matter in phase one of its trial versus Oracle. Near-simultaneously, Oracle filed its response to suggest that the judge rule on the "fair use" question that the jury couldn't agree on. Neither Google nor Oracle has responded to its counterpart's filing with the court.

more

MacNN Sponsor

MacNN Newsletter

FREE Apple, iPhone and Mac Newsletter

  • We will not share your email address with anyone.

    toggle

    Most Popular

    MacNN Sponsor

    Recent Reviews

    Autodesk Smoke 2015

    Since May of this year, Autodesk has been shipping the highly anticipated update to its high-end post-production video editing suite, ...

    Crucial MX100 256GB SATA-3 SSD

    While the price-per-gigabyte ratio for magnetic platter-based hard drives can't be beat, the speed that a SSD brings to the table for ...

    Narrative Clip

    With the advent of social media technology, people have been searching for new ways to share the events of their daily lives -- be it ...

    toggle

    Most Commented