Tag - FaceTime
Apple has responded to a damages retrial verdict that could someday see the iPhone maker paying out $625 million -- nearly double the original damages -- in a case it lost against VPN company VirnetX over VPN technology used in FaceTime, Messages, and VPN on Demand. In the 2011 case, the jury said the Cupertino company infringed willfully in the original complaint, and did not do enough to avoid further infringement after the initial verdict. On Friday, Apple filed a motion calling for a mistrial.
Apple was handed a rare defeat in a patent case today, with virtual private network (VPN) company VirnetX granted a $625.6 million verdict in the FaceTime patent damages retrial. While the attorneys for VirnetX claim that this is the second time a federal jury has found Apple liable for infringing patented technology, the hearing was not about finding infringement for the devices in the first trial, but determining what damages VirnetX should be paid for Apple's continued unlicensed use of the company's technology.
Monday launched the latest trial in the Apple versus VirnetX patent battle over virtual private network technologies used in FaceTime communications. In opening arguments in the retrial start, VirnetX demanded Apple pay $532 million in damages on the strength of more modern devices added to the complaint, saying that "Apple hasn't played fair. They have taken Virnetx's intellectual property without permission."
In a seeming coincidence to being the day Microsoft has launched its latest version of Windows, on Wednesday Apple released a driver update for those running Windows 7 and Windows 8 on their 2015 series MacBook computers, including the MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, and the latest Retina MacBook. The update is a FaceTime Camera driver update that improves compatibility with Windows when using Boot Camp-based installations.
Despite non-disclosure agreements signed by developers at WWDC, pirates and leakers are starting to make and reveal discoveries found in the first beta for iOS 9, which is expected to launch this fall to accompany the next round of iPhone and iPad hardware. Among the changes and improvements revealed in the code for the beta are hints of new higher-resolution FaceTime (front-facing) cameras, cellular-only Handoff, and notable women's health additions to HealthKit and the Health app.
Seriously, how often are you ever going to need to record a video of what's on the screen of your Mac? Unless you are the sort who routinely demonstrates things, you know it's not a very big number of times -- but we're going to tell you that it is precisely the same number of times that you should be using ScreenFlow 5.01.
Last Wednesday on Pointers, we talked about the many reasons one might want to do some voice-oriented recording of a more serious nature on one's Mac or iOS device, such as interviews or as part of creating a YouTube video. We also made some entry-level recommendations on decent mics (the built-in mic on most Macs is fine for FaceTime calls, but its limitations show up quickly when trying to do something professional-sounding) and capturing software. This time around, we'll talk about the mechanics of making a podcast.
Almost two years after it first added the option of two-factor verification to its iTunes and iCloud accounts, Apple has activated the extra layer of security for its iMessage and FaceTime services, further protecting users from the possibility of attackers gaining access. The extra step, if enabled, requires verification on another device beyond the usual name and password authentication.
In a recent "scorecard" report ranking the security and safety of various popular messaging systems, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) said that while no system was completely secure against "sophisticated, targeted forms of surveillance," Apple's iMessage and FaceTime and the end-to-end encryption they offer made it the best of the "mass-market options" for secure communications, beating out BlackBerry Protected and BlackBerry Messenger and other big-name messaging systems.
Patent holding firm VirnetX has filed a motion with the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, requesting a rehearing of a September decision tossing a $368.2 million verdict against Apple, and asking it to reinstate a District Court's damages award in full. In a press release, VirnetX says the decision was "contrary to the patent statute and Supreme Court precedent." It also asserts that it should receive damage payments on the basis that the District Court properly construed the claim term "secure communication link."