Tag - DOJ
This week on The MacNN Podcast episode 61, Mike and Charles briefly discuss how we've structured the leadership of this site modeled on the Dalek hierarchy, and in the tradition of the Daleks, the news is mostly bad -- and that's even before we get to the latest FBI/DOJ shenanigans, this week adding the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to the cast of this drama, sadly on the side of authoritarianism over liberty. The parade of really not-thought-through attempts to modernize privacy laws in the era of digital encryption continues.
Possibly belying the two-day-old claim that the process the FBI used to penetrate the San Bernardino shooter's iPhone 5c would only function on that one device, the law enforcement agency has agreed to assist Arkansas investigators unlock a pair of iOS devices. Earlier today, and less than 24 hours after the request was made by the county attorneys helming the investigation, the FBI agreed to aid prosecutors in the state access data on unknown models of iPhone and iPod owned by a pair of teenagers accused of killing two people.
Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak told online audiences today that he is very happy with the progress of Apple hardware and software. He further said that he approves of Tim Cook and especially of how the company continues the tradition of aiming to make good products. However, he told the readers of Reddit.com that he worries about what the Apple Watch reveals of the company's future.
After being largely ignored -- even after presenting evidence -- at the first bench trial and in the appeal of Apple's e-book antitrust conviction, four large industry groups representing the content creators and sellers of e-books have filed amicus curae ("friend of the court") briefs in support of Apple, urging the Supreme Court to overturn the rulings. The filings say that Amazon used loss-leader pricing to eliminate competition and abuse its monopoly, ultimately doing more harm to consumers than Apple has ever been accused of.
The judge at the head of the iPhone unlocking controversy court hearings has upped the ante somewhat. In arguments Monday, Judge James Orenstein said that forcing Apple to extract data from a suspect's iPhone 5s would be tantamount to forcing a pharmaceutical company to provide drugs for executions against company mandate.
This past Friday, the Comcast Time Warner Cable (TWC) merger was officially canceled. A report by Bloomberg Business indicates the resistance by both the Department of Justice (DoJ) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has been in play for quite a bit longer than just the week prior to when the deal was nixed.
The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has decided that Dish Network is liable for making 57 million phone calls in flagrant violation of telemarketing laws, including calling members of the "Do Not Call" list established by the US Government. A trial has been set for July in Illinois, with penalties of up to $16,000 possible for each violation. The Department of Justice filed the complaint at the FTC's request in March 2009. The US Department of Justice, on behalf of the FTC, is jointly litigating the case with four state co-plaintiffs -- California, Illinois, Ohio, and North Carolina.
Michael Bromwich, the court-appointed monitor for Apple's anti-trust compliance policies, demonstrated a marked change in attitude towards the company in his latest report, the first since a Court of Appeals and the DOJ significantly scaled back his powers of investigation and range of allowable duties following Apple complaints in February. A change of "point of contact" with the company has resulted in Apple being "more cooperative" than previously, Bromwich said.
Apple has officially filed for an appeal of US District Judge Denise Cote's recent decision, which denied both Apple's request to suspend an antitrust external compliance monitor (ECM) while an appeal of the main judgement is considered, and a request to disqualify the current appointee, Judge Cote's personal friend and former DOJ Inspector General Michael Bromwich.
Apple has filed a formal request with the same judge that appointed the antitrust compliance monitor to have him removed, citing a wide range of complaints and accusations of overreach -- including the monitor's own recent declarations, which the company says prove a pre-existing bias. Former DOJ Inspector General Michael Bromwich was a controversial choice for the post due to his lack of antitrust experience and personal relationship with the judge, among other problems and conflicts of interest.