toggle

AAPL Stock: 423 ( 0 )

http://www.macnn.com/articles/01/07/25/ascending.announces/

Ascending announces CalendarMonster 1.2

updated 06:55 pm EDT, Wed July 25, 2001

 
", 0, 0);


Ascending Technologies has announced CalendarMonster 1.2, a new version of its $50 Filemaker Pro calendar module that adds support for Mac OS X and Windows. Scheduled for release later this summer, CalendarMonster 1.2 features support for FileMaker Pro versions 4 through 5.5, support for European calendar formatting, enhanced search capabilities, improved navigation capabilities, expanded developer support through Renfield 2.0, and a new administrator utility.


by MacNN Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :

 software, business software
toggle

Comments

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    FRIST PROST

    Look at it this way - a FireWire iMac is $1000, right? Take off the monitor, which represents probably $150 of the retail cost. (Apple's cost - $40 or so). That's $850. Put it in a tower case and add 3 PCI slots (net cost - $25, or even close to zero if you use a cheap case. Even allowing $50 for a nice case, that's $900 for a G3 in a tower case with PCI slots.

    The cheapest G4 tower is $1699. Is the G4 worth $800 more than our hypothetical G3 tower? I don't think so, especially if the CPU is upgradeable in our cheap machine. That's the problem, the numbers on the G4 towers don't add up.

    If I buy a Dell, every step up in CPU speed is roughly $200, a bit more for the really top end. With Apple, the same 1 or 2 steps in CPU speed is a $1500 increase. That's the price of a whole second machine!

    Based on these calculations, it's obvious that Apple could profitably a fast G3 tower at $900 and make a tidy profit, maybe more than on the iMac. They owe it to their shareholders and loyal mac users to pursue this opportunity.

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    SECOND POST

    Are you out of your mind?
    Without going deep into details, you can't even begin to compare a G3 iMac to a G4 tower. Memory bandwidth, system bus, PCI architecture, IDE busses, RAM slots- all these things are faster and more abundant on a G4. You think the iMac monitor is only $40? You ARE out of your mind... The CRT itself is more than $100, plus the deflection board, another $150.

    You are forgetting what the driving force behind the Apple computer is here- 'Think Different', not 'Think cheap' or 'Think like other crappy PC manufacturers who are only out there to rip people off'. And did you think that the industrial design group for Apple works for free? Why do you suppose Apple received so many awards for the iMac design? Because they pay big bucks to people who know what they are doing...

    A G3 tower at this point would be about the dumbest thing they could do. Why would Apple undermine their own efforts to promote OS X running on a G4? Face the facts- the G4 is faster than the G3, even without OS X. If you think there is a market for another G3 tower, than go right ahead and make it yourself, Apple doesn't owe you anything.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Logitech FabricSkin Keyboard Folio for iPad

Since the fourth-generation iPad didn't evolve much over its predecessor, the market for iPad accessories has remained somewhat static ...

Huawei Ascend Mate

The Huawei Ascend Mate is a phone that fits the screen-size gap between the 4 to 5-inch smartphone and the seven-inch or more tablet, ...

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

toggle

Most Commented