toggle

AAPL Stock: 562.29 ( -3.03 )

BBC plans alternate video content

updated 03:35 pm EDT, Sun June 10, 2001


Following an inquiry from a reader about providing QuickTime-based content, BBC online's says that it has plans to post some of the site's video content in QuickTime and other formats:

"Thanks for your feedback. We chose the RealPlayer format because a free player is available for a greater number of hardware platforms and operating systems than any other. However, because of the number of requests we get for media in other formats, and because we are constantly reviewing our policies, we intend later this year to publish media for various different players."


by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    Where does it say QT?

    Maybe I'm just a skeptic, but I dont see anything in that quote above that indicates that Quicktime format will be offered. They just say 'various different players'

    It looks like a form letter and I'd bet that the majority of requests are for Windows Media, not quicktime. It would be great to see QT format available, but since quicktime makes up less than 4% of the streaming market, its really not all that likely.

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    Quote

    "We chose the RealPlayer format because a free player is available for a greater number of hardware platforms and operating systems than any other."

    I may just be misinterpreting this, but QT is also free.

    Ah well. I don't really watch that much on the BBC in any event, mostly read.

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    yes

    realplayer is available for linux quicktime isn't.

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    huh

    The reply from BBC does NOT say they will support quicktime -- only that they will support "various formats"

    What a dumb news item

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    bbc world news

    they already broadcast bbcworld news 24/7 in quicktime.

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    Quicktime for Linux

    We just need Quicktime for Linux and FreeBSD. That will shut up those BBC twits.

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    RealPlayer vs Quicktime

    I recently wanted to use Quicktime to stream music. After researching I would have to buy OS X Server. Not an option. Because of this I had to do it with RealPlayer. Apple does not make a non OS X version to stream content. Yes they are both free players, but to stream, RealProducer vs OS X is a couple of hundred dollars vs several hundred dollars for OS X Server and a learning curve just not acceptable at this time. To many things don't work with OS X yet even in classic.

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    QTSS is Free and Open

    I am pretty sure that QuickTime Streaming Server is open source and free, and that it already runs on Linux, maybe BSD, and certainly on regular Mac OS X (not server).

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    Buy OS X Server?

    I've been streaming Quicktime 5 content off of a Windows 2000 PC using Quicktime Streaming Server for a couple of months, and it cost me nothing. Where do you get off saying you need to buy OS X server for?

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    OS X Server...

    That guy/girl claiming to need X Server was either 1) dumb as a box of rocks, or 2) a FUDster

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented