toggle

AAPL Stock: 431.77 ( -0.23 )

http://www.macnn.com/articles/01/04/13/apple.removes/

Apple removes Power Mac G4/667

updated 11:00 am EDT, Fri April 13, 2001

 
", 0, 0);


Following MacUser UK's report yesterday, Apple has quietly removed the 667 MHz PowerMac G4 from the Apple Store. No replacement model or price changes have been made.


by MacNN Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :

 industry
toggle

Comments

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    667's don't sell well.

    The number is just too close to, well, you know.

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    Good Move

    Consumers don't need too many ludicrous choices like 533Mhz or a 667Mhz or 733Mhz. Remember the days of the 7200/7600/85000/8600/9500 and so on? Keep it simple! One high end model (some of us) can drool over and a lower end for the fiscally strapped.

    Good move Apple!

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    Good Choice

    Dual 667's perhaps, but a single is pointless...perhaps without the dual 533 it would have been a good choice.

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    Have all of em dual

    Why doesn't Apple just make all the models dual processors again?
    This way they can dump the single 533, and be able to sell the 667's avoiding loosing money offering a somewhat unpopular system. The price of each system still allows Apple to profit quite a bit anyways... they don't really include as many useful software with them which PC makers seem to sell their systems for the included package(AppleWorks should be included).

    Apple isn't going to have that many sales until MacWorld NY, which everyone will be getting ready for systems with OS X preinstalled. I'm holding off until then for a new system...

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    too bad the 533 are 7410s

    and not 7450s. I do not appreciate the lack of clear distinction on apples store.

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    dual?

    Why doesn't Apple just make all the models dual processors again?

    ummm...becuase moto can't make enought of them?

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    G4 + availability

    Maybe there's a good side to this.

    Wouldn't it stand to reason that if there were problems delivering 733 G4+ chips, Apple would keep a 667 option?

    Maybe 733's are in plentiful [relatively speaking] supply and Apple is stocking up on 800-1GHz chips for July Mac World.

    OK, I'm a Pollyanna. :-)

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    stupid mouse

    who cares about dual processors- i want a two-button mouse with a scrollbar that works. that's all.

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    Look for

    Look for the 733 single to take the place of the 667. Look for a Dual 733 to be the top end machine.
    Thats my guess.

  1. 0

    Joined:

    0

    Where are the Trolls?

    What... Are all the trolls taking Good Friday off? I almost feel obliged to stand in for them with the usual "It just goes to show Apple sucks" garbage! But I think they've got a business to run and the 677 config was pretty marginal. Now, I'm looking forward to MacWorld. If they've got anything else as cool as the TiBook, that will rock! Oh, wait, I mean Apple's about to go under and OSX sucks and all that jazz. NOT!

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Logitech FabricSkin Keyboard Folio for iPad

Since the fourth-generation iPad didn't evolve much over its predecessor, the market for iPad accessories has remained somewhat static ...

Huawei Ascend Mate

The Huawei Ascend Mate is a phone that fits the screen-size gap between the 4 to 5-inch smartphone and the seven-inch or more tablet, ...

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

toggle

Most Commented