toggle

AAPL Stock: 502.12 ( -0.09 )

Intel, others support Apple lawsuit

updated 08:40 am EDT, Fri April 29, 2005

Intel on Apple lawsuit


Intel, Genentech and the Business Software Alliance filed court briefs this week. Apple wants to subpoena e-mail records from Mac site PowerPage, which the company says leaked confidential product information. The briefs, filed this week in a California appeals court, support a tentative ruling by Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge James Kleinberg. "Strong trade secret laws are vital to the health of California's high-technology business and to the economy of the nation as a whole," Intel and BSA stated in their joint brief. "There is no public interest in having such trade secrets stolen and plastered on the Internet for competitors and others to see." Recently, many news organizations have voiced their support for the Mac rumor sites named in the lawsuit.


by MacNN Staff

(3)

TAGS :

 industry
toggle

Comments

  1. Person Man

    Professional Poster

    Joined: Jun 2001

    0

    Finally some sense

    Finally!

    Nice to see that some people actually get it.

    These cases are not about the ability to protect sources who provide information of public interest to journalists, but about protection of trade secrets ONLY. They have nothing to do with eroding the "free speech rights of bloggers, either.

    None of the rumor sites are blogs to begin with, so suggesting that a ruling would infringe upon bloggers' rights is ridiculous.

    As the judge himself stated, an interested public is NOT the same thing as public interest. There need to be protections in place for corporate trade secrets when there is no danger to the public by withholding them.

  1. olePigeon

    Clinically Insane

    Joined: Dec 1999

    0

    Yes, SOMEONE got it right

    I'm sick of those "Apple suing bloggers" and "are bloggers considered Journalists?" articles everywhere. Apple isn't suing the sites (yet), they're trying to get a list of names of the people who broke their NDAs and are sharing trade secrets.

  1. Jonathan-Tanya

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2004

    0

    @olePgeon

    hmm where to start with your though...ThinkSecret, O'grady's powerpage, and apple insider are not blogger sites... they are more or less, set up in a traditional news magazine format, with stories about products and rumors about products.

    That said...ThinkSecret most definately was the target of a lawsuit. The other two were not directly targeted, but had to hire lawyers anyway since apple tried to force these journalists to reveal their sources.

    I think you are somewhat confused about whats going on, but maybe that's for effect?

    @person man: As the judge himself stated, an interested public is NOT the same thing as public interest.

    Yes, but journalism is important to the public interest...which is why the judge stayed his own ruling pending the appeal...this is going to be decided by a higher court based on principle, not funny little ditties.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Powerbag Business Class Bag

Many companies currently offer battery packs and various accessories to keep smartphones and other gadgets charged when away from an o ...

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed