toggle

AAPL Stock: 509.46 ( + 6.86 )

PJ: iPod not Apple's only growth avenue

updated 10:10 am EST, Wed March 16, 2005

PJ on iPod \"halo effect\"


Research firm Piper Jaffray today said it believes Apple will gain share in the personal computer market over the next 2-3 years. Senior analyst Gene Munster attributes this potential to the iPod 'halo effect,' "continuous innovation leading to highly functional products at realistic price points," and security/performance issues for Windows-based PCs.

iPod is not "the only potential growth avenue"



Recent focus has been on quarterly iPod unit numbers and "Apple's domination in digital music is
a critical piece to the story." However, Munster says "we do not believe that iPod is the only potential
growth avenue for the company." Indirectly, the firm expects the iPod to be a foundation for growth in other parts of Apple's business. By the end of calendar 2005, "more than 30 million iPods will have shipped, providing Apple with a greater scope of awareness for various products." Put simply, the firm expects "the massive number of iPods that will populate the market over the next four to eight quarters will trigger interest in other non-iPod Apple products, most notably Mac notebooks and laptops."



2.3 to 3.5 percent market share in 2006



Current numbers assume an immaterial market share gain over the next eight quarters. The firm's current Mac unit estimates assume market share of 2.0% in 2004, moving up 0.3 percentage points to 2.3% in 2006 (based on overall PC unit shipment estimates from IDC). "We believe these estimates for Apple (Mac) share in the personal computer market will prove to be conservative." Although "it is difficult to anticipate the pace at which Apple can gain share in the personal computer market," the firm says "we have formulated a sensitivity analysis that looks at the impact to Apple's numbers based on various levels of PC market share." The firm concludes that a market share of 3.5% in 2006 is possible and "the incremental add to our existing EPS estimate would be $0.30, or 25%."


by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. trevc

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2000

    0

    I guess it's huge ...

    ... but when you try to get a company like ours to test for Safari when developing web pages, they say ... it's less than 5%, not worth the effort.

    What a difference 6% would make. Dare to dream ... dare to dream.

  1. macimmortal

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    What a crock

    I give Apple another two years...
    :)

  1. Jonathan-Tanya

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2004

    0

    web share rises faster

    web share rises faster than marketshare...total market includes machines not connected to the web.

    everything something on the factory floor, to back end file servers to stores, to the office typewriter...

    no, 3.5% marketshare will equate to well over 5% of web surfers...apple tends to sell to the consumer space and even in the professional space to web connected machines...oh I guess the Virginia tech supercomputer probably doesn't surf the web all day...but for the most part I think they are more skewed to internet connected machines than the overall pc market.

  1. umijin

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2004

    0

    Not likely...

    Unless Apple gets its act together on the computer hardware end, any gains they see from this so-called 'halo' will probably fade.

    They are falling woefully behind in the laptop arena - in both features and real innovation (hard drive shock absorbers and poorly functioning track pads don't count) - AND speed. Yeah, we don't need to hear excuses about technological challenges in getting the G5 in laptops.

    Without some hardware progress, the Mac platform is going to look pretty weak to what's out there in the windows world. Tiger or no Tiger.

  1. dashiel

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2001

    0

    testing for safari

    if you're company refuses to test for safari i would be concerned about their long term viability. not because apple is going to have some massive shift in market share, but because any company willing to refuse service to 5% of customers is one not run by particularly business savvy people. i'm not talking about you develop a C# app and would have to spend a significant amount of time getting a similar app running on OS X.

    if they're not concerned about 5% of mac users what about the 5% of firefox users?

  1. Eriamjh

    Addicted to MacNN

    Joined: Oct 2001

    0

    Go market share!

    What kind of a name is Piper Jafray?

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Re: not likely

    They are falling woefully behind in the laptop arena - in both features and real innovation (hard drive shock absorbers and poorly functioning track pads don't count) - AND speed. Yeah, we don't need to hear excuses about technological challenges in getting the G5 in laptops.

    Actually, you're not talking 'speed' but 'perception of speed', as in "These laptops have G4s in them, what a crock!" However, if you look at the sites that compared the Mac Mini with the imac G5, you'd notice they actually performed close to the same in most tasks, and certainly not kick-a** quicker, or even close to it.

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Re: not likely

    Oh, but your point on not getting their act together on computers is right-on. Didn't want you to think I was happy with the G5s not being updated for 9 months, and it certainly looks like they won't be for another 3.

  1. hayesk

    Professional Poster

    Joined: Sep 1999

    0

    Re: testing for Safari

    I agree completely. It's a stupid company that evaluates support based on marketshare.

    Imagine going to a hospital with a broken arm and being told to get lost because only 2% of hospital patients come in with broken arms.

    A smart company would say "hey, if we tested for standards compatibility, we could support almost every user, with only an insignificant amount of tweaks to work around browser bugs". If you write to the standards instead of IE, then the extra customers come almost free.

  1. umijin

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2004

    0

    Laptops lag iMacs...

    >Actually, you're not talking 'speed' but 'perception of speed', as in >"These laptops have G4s in them, what a crock!" However, if you look >at the sites that compared the Mac Mini with the imac G5, you'd >notice they actually performed close to the same in most tasks, and >certainly not kick-a** quicker, or even close to it.

    I don't agree for processor intensive activities. Sure, you can probably find many tasks that run at similar speeds on both chips. But if I'm gonna spend moolah on a new Mac laptop, I want a machine that isn't using two year old processor technology.

    It's inexcusable that the econo iMac (desktop) line uses a G5, but the premier laptop line sits in G4 land. It tells me that Apple is going nowhere fast - and doesn't inspire confidence in a purchase of a new PowerBook.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

X-Rite ColorMunki Photo

Color calibration is the art of tweaking your monitor so that the colors represented on screen better match real life and your printer ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed