05/21/2004, 11:40pm, EDT
Friday, May 21st
Another URI exploit in Mac OS X?
Filed under: troubleshooting
,
, 8
,
,
,
,
,
05/21/2004, 11:40pm, EDT
Friday, May 21st
Filed under: troubleshooting
,
, 8
,
,
,
,
,
Click Now for Great Deals on FUJITSU Products!: Limited Time Offer on Lifebook Notebooks, Tablet PCs, and Ultra-Mobile PCs!
Get Special Offers on LENOVO Mobility Solutions!: TopSeller Desktops, affordable Notebooks, and much more while supplies last!
Get Special Rebates on SONY Mobility Solutions!: Synnex Resellers - Take advantage of Special Offers on a variety of Notebook series from Sony today!
Check out Rebates on MOTION COMPUTING Tablets!: Perfect for any Healthcare provider! Buy now and get rebates on Motion C5 and LE1700 Tablet PCs!
VMware Fusion for $59.99 - limited time offer: Run Windows on a Mac without rebooting with VMware Fusion
Buy from The Apple Store, iTunes.com, Amazon.com, TechDepot, OfficeDepot, Computers4Sure, or donate.
subscribe to comments
for this article
The update for 10.2.8 says:
"Security Update 2004-05-24 delivers a number of security enhancements and is recommended for all Macintosh users. This update includes the following components:
HelpViewer
Terminal"
Well, here it is. The real fix is to completely separate the 'helper' type->handler resolution into two separate sections: one for trusted references generated by local applications that know they are local and that already have local access; and one for untrusted references embedded in documents. ANY document, whether local or remote, should not be able to cause the launch of any helper unless that helper is known to be prepared to deal with untrusted data.
Not "unless it's not known to have a flaw", but unless it is known to be designed to expect untrusted data.
If Microsoft had done that almost a decade ago there would have been about 90% fewer virus and worm incidents in the Windows world. If Apple doesn't do it, they will soon lose the cachet of being "virus free by design" that they have now.