toggle

AAPL Stock: 423 ( -8.77 )

http://www.macnn.com/articles/03/11/04/'big.mac'/

'Big Mac' Ranked third Fastest Supercomputer

updated 11:30 pm EST, Tue November 4, 2003

 
", 0, 0);

\'Big Mac\' ranked No. 3


A supercomputer made from 1,100 off-the-shelf Apple Macs at Virginia Tech now among the world's 500 fastest supercomputers, many of which handle with ease 1 trillion calculations per second. The Terascale Cluster computer, nicknamed ``Big Mac'' by some, conducts 9.6 trillion calculations per second. Theoretically, Big Mac could handle a potential 17 teraflops, or 17 trillion operations per second, according to the Associated Press. That still falls short of the No. 1 machine, Japan's Earth Simulator, whose 5,000-plus processors keep it on top with 35.8 teraflops, with the potential of another 5 teraflops.


by MacNN Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :

 industry
toggle

Comments

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    www.top500.org all g5 ...

    Apples supercomputer uses 3 times less electricity+cooling and is 5 times cheaper (for the result speed) than any other cluster.

    Soon you will see mac g5 clusters + infiniband (shared memory) dominate the entire top 30 spots in the www.top500.org list in 12 months.


    The only exceptions are clusters paid for with taxpayers money at the federal level.

    There should be criminal investigations and audits if any more intel itanium 2 or intel xeons are bought in 2004 using taxpayer funds.

    shame on government fanboys of intel for not recognizing value.

    10.28 teraflops for merely 3 million dollars of apple machines + some expensive networking cards and cables. Astounding.

    great article here :

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/61/33780.html

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Goverment...

    Everyone knows the US government gives contracts to the biggest campaign contributors as kickbacks.

    They will go sure Apple's are cheaper, but Dell are more expensive and a 10 million dollar cluster is better then a 5 million dollar one. When it comes to supercomputers who wants to be cheap?

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    ECC

    Now Apple needs to release G5 XServes with ECC support and clustering like this could really take off.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Email

    I love these supercomputers but I always imagine some poor user going mad and screaming, 'I don't care how fast it is - I just want to check my email!' - though of course I doubt it is set up for email...

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    it's fast...

    ....but is it snappier?

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Snappier Joke is Dead

    Yeah that's pretty funny! You dumb as*! That joke is like 3 years old...it's just stupid now.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    5120 G5's = Top Spot

    If you expand VaTech's system to 5120 G5's you have the same peak teraflop performance (40TF) as the 5120 processors in Japan's Earth Simulator. So on a per-chip basis it looks like the G5 is tied for top place. (And btw, did ya see what the designer of VT's cluster said about Itanium? "Ironically, they lost the gigahertz game," Varadarajan told Wired, referring to Intel. "(The G5) is extremely faster than the Itanium II, hands down.")

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Woot!

    Word has it that it benchmarks Quake 3 at 750 fps, FINALLY beating any wintellian box! And that's before iD does a "cluster" version.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Great News

    I think this is great news for apple/ibm and a marketing coup. They have proven a real cost savings for super computing. This can enable many a university in super computing.

    Though, I really think it is important that the US construct machines that could match the Japanese super computer. So, the key is for the US to do *both* philosophies.

    Now if big mac was only a rack mount.

    Congrats again...

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Big Mac Rack Mount

    'Big Mac' IS a Rackmount. Many, MANY racks... ;-)

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Logitech FabricSkin Keyboard Folio for iPad

Since the fourth-generation iPad didn't evolve much over its predecessor, the market for iPad accessories has remained somewhat static ...

Huawei Ascend Mate

The Huawei Ascend Mate is a phone that fits the screen-size gap between the 4 to 5-inch smartphone and the seven-inch or more tablet, ...

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

toggle

Most Commented