Exclusive Deal While supplies last, save 40% off over 40 iPhone 5 and iPhone 4/4S cases and chargers as well as Samsung S III cases at Kensington.com. Use coupon code 'SAVE40%' at checkout to receive this exclusive discount.      
toggle

AAPL Stock: 445.15 ( + 3.01 )

http://www.macnn.com/articles/03/05/23/final.802.11g/

Final 802.11g standard slows to 20Mb/sec

updated 01:15 pm EDT, Fri May 23, 2003

 
", 0, 0);


Infoworld reports: "The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) has approved a new and wireless LANs that will have a true throughput for Internet-type connections of between 10M and 20Mbit/sec., far lower than 54Mbit/sec. raw data rate initially billed for the standard....he lower actual vs. raw data rates for 802.11g arose from the need to assure backward compatibility with millions of existing 802.11b Wi-Fi client devices and access points that operate in the same 2.4-GHz frequency band....even at these data rates the 802.11g devices still outperform 802.11b devices, which have a raw data rate of 11Mbit/sec. but an actual throughput of about half that speed." Apple adopted a preliminary version of the standard for its AirPort Extreme products and touted a 54Mbps througput. A MacNN reader followed up on the article:

"The article is misleading. The 802.11g now provides for 'better' backward compatibility in mixed environments, which will slow transmission (by about 2Mbps) on networks with both 802.11b and 802.11g devices. However, the networks almost never achieve the theoretical transmission maximums--in this case 54Mpbs on an 802.11g-only network; the actual transmission speeds of *both* the older and newly revised 802.11g standard is somewhere between 20-24Mpbs. So the revised standard may slow things a bit in mixed environments, but not as much as the article makes it seem."


by MacNN Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :

 industry
toggle

Comments

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Misunderstanding

    The IEEE said TRUE throughput would be 20 Mbit/s. This is about what it already was in all of the draft products including Apple's Airport Extreme. The 54 Mbit/s number is a THEORETICAL maximum.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    So...

    ...what does this mean about the Apple products? Are they 802.11b compatible? Are they 54Mbps? Will they comply with this IEEE "change"? Who is buried in Grant's tomb? Why am I asking so many questions? :-)

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Very misleading

    The article is misleading, to say the least. The actual throughput of 802.11g HAS NOT SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGED between the draft spec and this revised spec. There's a small speed hit now when 802.11g is used in conjunction with an 802.11b card, but it's on the order of 2 Mbps max. The actual throughputs in the draft spec and the revised spec are still 20-25 Mbps. Skeptical? Time some data transfers on your existing Airport Extreme card and see. This was all covered in painful detail on slashdot.org yesterday.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Uh, hmm.

    And this is a surprise to anyone who has an ounce of intelligence? 54Mbps was theoretical peak. Actual peak would be roughly half (and usually less) of that figure. It is almost the case with any such theoretical throughputs.

    Why do peeps gotta be so negative.

    Macs for life, niggaz!

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    802.11a

    How does this compare with 802.11a, the other 54mbps standard.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    re:802.11a

    Does it mean Apple went with the wrong standard?

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Re:802.11a

    How does it compare: It still wins. 802.11a is a great standard but, due to the higher frequency used for operations, the signal drops off very very quickly. You won't get the maximum speed with 802.11a unless it's clear line of sight and very nearby (say 10 feet or so)

    Did Apple go with the wrong standard? No. I asked this question of the Airport hardware team around the time of the product launch and think their answer was right on the money. They went with 802.11g over 802.11a both becuase of backward compatibility and because you get much closer to the full bandwidth available over much longer ranges.

    Apple could have put 802.11a products into the Mac. If they did, things would be a lot more costly, there wouldn't have been the nice backward compatibility we see today and the range would have sucked. Do you still think they made a bad choice?

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    MacNN: Fix This Article!

    As it stands, the wording of this article is very misleading. 802.11g has NOT slowed down significantly, as other posters have already explained. I'm sick and tired of baseless sensationalism in the media!

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    802.11a

    One article I read says that 802.11a (also touted as 54MBit/s) gets around 24MBit/s max actual throughput. Not much different than 802.11g. This whole article is very misleading by comparing apples to oranges (no "Apple" pun intended) of actual throughput to raw data rate...

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    dammit

    .. you mean my 100baseT switch isn't really giving me a true 10MB/sec?!?!!!?!?

    that's it.. i'm taking it back for a refund!! And my 56k modem too, since i can only connect at 26400kbps

    lying b*******..

    seriously folks.. is this a surprise to anyone with working brain cells?

    =)

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to overstate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming decline ...

toggle

Most Commented