MacUpdate Weekend Sale :This weekend MacUpdate has slashed prices on Painter 12 and Painter Lite. Painter 12 retails for $429, but has been reduced by 54% to $199. Painter Lite has seen a 58% price cut from $69 to $29. Hurry, because these deals are only available until May 19th 2013.      
toggle

AAPL Stock: 433.26 ( -1.32 )

http://www.macnn.com/articles/02/07/24/finale.2004/

Finale 2004 to bring OS X native support

updated 04:15 pm EDT, Wed July 24, 2002

 
", 0, 0);


In response to growing concerns over its OS X support, Coda Music has noted that Finale 2003, which is due later this summer (after the release of the Windows version) will operate as a Classic application under OS X, providing "full access" to its new features: "Coda is strongly committed to delivering a Native version of Finale for Mac OS X as quickly as we can... Finale Macintosh is undergoing an array of architectural improvements that will benefit all Macintosh users as well as facilitate full OS X implementation. A number of these changes will be apparent in the release of Finale 2003, available in the summer of 2002. Finale 2004, scheduled for the summer of 2003, will be a Native OS X application."


by MacNN Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :

 audio
toggle

Comments

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Too Little, Too Late

    Coda is either intentionally shooting themselves in the foot or is very stupid. Sibelius has already produced AND shipped an OSX (not classic) version of their score writing software. I made the switch from Finale to Sibelius last year while they were both OS9 programs. Sibelius blew Finale away in ease of use and stability even then. If I were other composers, I'd take a serious look at Sibelius. It can import your Finale files and is much more intuitve. Wait until Summer 2003 for an OSX version of Finale? Are they nuts???

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    true, but

    Sibelius IS a much better product. However, (judging through my sister, who is entering music school) Finale remains a competitor. The Mac OS X issue, at least for students in (music) college, is not as big an issue as it seems. There were a lot of old macs at the schools my sister looked at; according to the person I spoke too, it was easier to get MIDI working on old macs than new, and the faculty weren't eager to switch to PC's.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    hhmmmm

    3 years after mac os x comes out, finale will have a native version.
    quite speedy!

    sounds like they might be related to those b******* over at quark

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    quark

    "3 years after mac os x comes out, finale will have a native version.
    quite speedy!

    sounds like they might be related to those b******* over at quark "

    No, the losers at Quark are in a class all by themselves - and the publishing industry will just continue to take it up the butt and ask for more...

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Sibelius is better anyway

    I've been using Sibelius now for about 4 months, and it is wonderful. It just feels so much more intuitive than Finale, and it's already OS X native.

    By the time Finale 2004 comes out, Sibelius will have left Coda in the dust. I would encourage Mac musicians to give Sibelius a try, it truly is a great app.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Apple's fault

    Apple is the one who waited until 10.2 to add proper support for audio apps. Prior to 10.2, OS X didn't have what it takes for running audio apps. Blame Apple, not the developers.

  1. ::snowman::

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 2001

    0

    re: Apple's fault

    do you know fully what you are talking about?

    Finale is used to *compose* music ... y'know, write those little notes on a piece of paper ... sort of like a word processor for music. With audio functions of course.

    You may be thinking of Audio *engineering* or *mixing* with apps like Pro Tools or Mix Man or any of those sound/audio engineering apps.

    And like the other posts say, Sibelius was made a while ago for OSX.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Finale vs OSX

    It is extraordinarily frustrating to have this kind of delay in OSX conversion. Even the demo for Sibelius runs native in OSX!! And the other major problem with the current version of Finale is the incompatabilty with Quick Time 5 & 6 for internal (non-MIDI) playback of files. When I asked for tech support with this problem, I was told to uninstall QT 5 or 6 and reinstall QT 4. This is unbelievable!! They blame the problem on Apple, and not their software.... any other music apps that don't work with QT 5/6 out there??

    I'm tempted to switch to Sibelius, but their policy of having to get serial # from the company everytime you install the program, reminds me too much of Microsoft. I do like Finale, having used it for more than 10 years now.... I just wish they'd get their act together.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    fed up & going elsewhere

    As a Finale user since 1.0, it is with disgust that I am now switching to another engraving program.

    Over the years I’ve worked with my publisher to accept Finale files, urged my composition students to use the program, taught classes in its use, and been a supporter of plug-in development. I’ve developed and published fonts to overcome Finale shortcomings. I’ve taken support calls from friends at 2:00 AM. I’ve even enjoyed the camaraderie of fellow users as we struggle to live with bugs that go unresolved in version after version.

    It seems indisputable now that Coda is not continuing significant development on the Mac side. I have switched to OS X, and my school and many parts of my university are currently in the process of upgrading as well. Certainly, I can no longer recommend the program to my students, and I will not be able to approve purchases of Finale for my school.

    A good application - and Finale in most ways is a good application - is useless if it can’t keep up with advances in an OS.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Finale NOT for mac

    Having been a college music student, living in a dorm, and a music frat... everyone i know has finale. While we sit and ponder who is at fault here... Apple... Coda.... my friends are using thier WinXP versions of Finale in complete bliss. There's getting to more and more tempting reasons to leave this platform. These lackluster products in key areas are trying my patience. Office X is awful, Aqua is obnoxious, and now Finale is bombing. I've never considered a PC ever. Since 1984 an Apple has been on my or my parents desk. Looking past brand loyalty and for once in my life practically.... the s** appeal of apple's boxes isn't holding me in like it used to.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to overstate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming decline ...

Samsung Galaxy S 4

Samsung's new flagship Android smartphone, the Galaxy S 4, faces even stiffer competition than its popular predecessor. With a five-in ...

toggle

Most Commented