toggle

AAPL Stock: 441.35 ( + 1.69 )

http://www.macnn.com/articles/02/04/29/earthlink.satellite/

EarthLink Satellite for Macs within 90 days

updated 04:45 pm EDT, Mon April 29, 2002

 
", 0, 0);


MacNN reader Sean Pons notes that EarthLink expects their Satellite service to be up and running for Macs within 90 days. "EarthLink says they expect Mac satellite service available within 90 days. [It costs] $69.95 for 2-way satellite service (400k down, 128k up). Equipment is $399 and installation is $199. They will take your name, number, email and say they will contact you when the service is available."


by MacNN Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :

 industry
toggle

Comments

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Holy Cr@p!

    ...is that expensive!!

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    not expensive...

    ...mysterious. i wouldn't mind paying for it, but where on earthlink did you see that info?

    links to stories are only cool when they at least *kind of* confirm the rumor, you know?

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    way too much

    I just don't see the benefit. This is competing with the already well established cable/DSL companies. Just like sat TV this will need line of site to the SATs.
    On another note...it already has all the bad PR of sat TV counting against it...it will have the same drawbacks.

    Only real customer will be the peeps that can't get and won't have availibility of other services. Park Rangers can now surf the web! WOOHOOO!

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    the point is...

    ...not to compete with cable/DSL -- it's to offer high speed access to those out in the sticks (or on the edge of town like me). I have no other choice but to go satellite, and $89.99 a month isn't bad, considering I have to either move out of my wonderful house, or run my own lines to get any high speed access.

    Only gripe I have is the "install" fee, which usually consists of a complete idiot putting his nasty hands all over my baby, err G3.

  1. sanford

    Mac Enthusiast

    Joined: May 2001

    0

    Install fee

    I think the install fee in this case refer mainly to the installation of the satellite transceiver equipment. You can probably talk the guy into letting you configure the Mac.

    But what confuses me is how they currently offer the service for Windows but can't for Macs. If it's just IP using PPPoE, bouncing signals off GEOs out there in the ionosphere or troposphere or wherever they fly, then why can't you just plug a Mac into their network bridge on the earthside.

    Same sort of routine as you get from some DSL providers: we do not offer Mac service. Well, of course they do, because Macs use IP too. Just borrow a friends PC for the install day, then switch it out with your Mac after the satellite guy leaves. If you need PPPoE, OS X has it built-in, as do many SOHO ethernet routers which also offer the ability to share your broadband connection with other IP-networked computers.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    good price

    I can't wait to sign up!!

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    hmm

    Maybe they don't have the service for macs because they have no one who is knowledgeable about the platform if there would be a problem with getting it to connect to the internet?

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Dufus

    It's for people who can't get cable/DSL - and YES, there are lots of people in this boat.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    blah...

    I've used LAN, T1, Cable, SDSL, IDSL, Sattelite, and regular modems...and to comment on the current generation of the Sattelite modem to my experience...
    first, a 2 second bounce delay due to the signal bouncing...in theory, everything should be at the speed of light, but its not the case, so don't even think 'bout online gaming with it.
    Second, depending on the time of day, bandwidth varies significantly. This might be due to position of the sattelite or otherwise, but morning connection speed are acceptable while afternoon slows to a craw.
    Third, similar to Cable, it's a shared bandwidth, which could contribute more to the bandwidth problem.
    So a fractional T1 would be a better solution IMHO

  1. sderaj

    Junior Member

    Joined: Mar 2001

    0

    Could you..

    ..use this like rickashay (spelling)?

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to overstate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming decline ...

toggle

Most Commented