Exclusive Deal While supplies last, save 40% off over 40 iPhone 5 and iPhone 4/4S cases and chargers as well as Samsung S III cases at Kensington.com. Use coupon code 'SAVE40%' at checkout to receive this exclusive discount.      
toggle

AAPL Stock: 445.15 ( + 3.01 )

http://www.macnn.com/articles/01/12/04/apple's.gigawire/

Apple's Gigawire mystery draws speculation

updated 01:15 pm EST, Tue December 4, 2001

 
", 0, 0);


OSOpinion author Kelly McNeill has produced an editorial speculating on Apple's purported "Gigawire" project, for which the company has filed a trademark application. Apple's application says the device is in some regard related to "computers, telecommunications equipment and devices, or computer peripheral devices." McNeill opines that the device could be anything from an enhanced clustering scheme, to a digital audio/video transmission tool.


by MacNN Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :

 
toggle

Comments

  1. chabib

    Joined:

    0

    wireless firewire

    it's likely the wireless firewire protocol that's forthcoming.

  1. Joined:

    0

    umm no

    nope,

    The only wireless firewire that 'may' be coming is going to be wireless 'firewire' at 54Mbs.

    There was just and article on this a day or so ago...
    The Firewire peeps and joining with the wireless peeps to make this happen.

    Gigawire will likely be a HIGH speed connection to join multiple computers for clustering purposes.

    or

    The name apple gives Firewire2, which will be capable of transferring at speeds of 800Mbps, 1.6Gbps, and 3.2Gbps over optical cable.

    Later

  1. ebeitzuri

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2000

    0

    Duh

    If it was wireless firewire, why the h*** would they call it giga[b]wire[/b]!?

    It's so painfully obvious that this is Firewire2. Firewire 2 transmits data at 1.6 Gigabits per second over a wire. Gigabit speed over a wire = Gigawire.

    What's so difficult to figure out here?

  1. beno

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2003

    0

    it's not obvious

    It's so painfully obvious that this is Firewire2

    that would be dumb. companies don't change the name of the product/feature every time it's capacity increases. can you imagine the confusion in consumerland?

    besides, firewire 2 is 800 mbits/s.

  1. guru

    Joined:

    0

    re: it's not so obvious

    that would be dumb. companies don't change the name of the product/feature every time it's capacity increases. can you imagine the confusion in consumerland?

    Agreed. Why change the name of your brand when you've got wide user recognition across the board. Apple would definitely be risking much by changing this late in the game and would have to invest much in re-educating the masses. I would guess Gigawire may be something totally different or unexpected.

  1. Makosuke

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Nah...

    I'm with the obvious guy; sounds an awful lot like a faster incarnation of Firewire to me. Maybe not, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if they changed/added to the name to differentiate it from USB2, the old FireWire, or just make it sound "cooler". GigaWire does have more of a ring than FireWire2.

    Besides, consumers are already dealing with 3 different names for FireWire, depending on who you're aksing: FireWire (Apple), iLink (sony), and of course 1394 (most other companies).

  1. Joined:

    0

    Maybe Apple is skipping

    over Firewire 2 (800 Mbps) and jumping to 1.2 Mbps instead of the 1.6 Mbps. That would make USB 2.0 look as fast as USB 1.0 is to Firewire 1. I'm not talking about actual transfer rate here. I'm saying that people will see 1.2 Mbps and say, "hey, Giagwire is 3 times faster than USB." What the general public doesn't know is that current Firewire is about 40 times faster than USB 1.0. Not to mention the other benefits of firewire dealing with powered devices and cable lengths, etc.

    Even if I'm wrong (which is very likely) It would be silly if Apple called a new wireless standard Gigawire which would imply the use of a cable.

  1. \0

    Joined:

    0

    Hmm,

    Maybe a new networking interface?

  1. synergy

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Gigawire

    Its not just a capacity increase, Apple is probably adding a bunch more capabilities into it. New name to connotate new stuff. Yes its backwards compatible with firewire, but it does much more as well.

  1. maniacal

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2000

    0

    GIGA.....

    Hmm wouldn't change the name of the standard. How about ethernet to Gigabit, or USB to USB 2.0... Those are changes to the name. Now Yes I do believe that they were working on a new version of firewire that was supposed to be 800MB/S but that figure is not a GIG... So I suppose that maybe they went one step further and exceeded the 1 gig mark hence Gigawire. Makes sense since the firewire 2 was mentioned over 2 years ago. Since it was never implemented they could have just superceded it all together.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to overstate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming decline ...

toggle

Most Commented