toggle

AAPL Stock: 125.69 ( -0.31 )

Printed from http://www.macnn.com

Samsung loses appeal in Netherlands, faces sales ban

updated 09:10 am EDT, Wed May 21, 2014

Found guilty of infringing Apple 'bounce back' patent

The Court of Appeal in The Hague has upheld a lower court's finding that Samsung copied Apple's "bounce back" patent, and has thus issued a sales injunction on not only the accused devices but any current or future ones that Samsung may be selling that also violate the patent. All of the original accused products are now off the market; however, the ruling also has implications for Google and its Android operating system, some versions of which also infringe the patent.



Google has been challenging the validity of Apple's US patent on the "bounce back" technique, but has not yet won any victories over the patent. The sales ban issued by the court covers only Samsung products that infringe, even if the actual infringement is part of a stock install of Android -- but Apple could conceivably now use the decision to go after Google directly over its own copying of the technique. Samsung has since developed a workaround alternative "blue flash" technique to signal users they have reached the end of a list.

This is the first time that a sales ban against Samsung has applied to any future products that might infringe, effectively requiring Samsung to never use the technique, and to change any instances of Android that employ it in Samsung's products. The specifically-accused products that were found guilty of copying Apple's patent include the original Galaxy S, SII and Ace line of Samsung smartphones. The "bounce back" patent was also part of the first Apple-Samsung trial, in which Apple was awarded nearly a billion dollars over wide infringement by Samsung.





by MacNN Staff

POST TOOLS:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. pairof9s

    Senior User

    Joined: 01-03-08

    I would think going after Android is now exempt due to the Apple-Google detente agreement last week.

  1. Jeronimo2000

    Forum Regular

    Joined: 08-20-01

    Still: ouch.

  1. Charles Martin

    MacNN Editor

    Joined: 08-04-01

    The detente you refer to only extends to the (now sold off) Motorola Mobility and Google's liability thereof; Google itself and its Android OS are still fair game as I understand matters, should Apple choose to sue Google directly (it hasn't thus far). Articles about how the "thermonuclear war" is over may well prove to be premature.

  1. coffeetime

    Senior User

    Joined: 11-15-06

    Nice. Samsung is sunken.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook

toggle

Most Popular

Advertisement

Recent Reviews

Prong PWR Case

Ultimately there's one thing we all want from smartphone accessories; we want options. When it comes to keeping our iPhone charged, w ...

iHome iBT74 Color Changing Bluetooth Speaker

There's no reason why your tech can't look good while doing what it was designed to do. That's the reason that sports cars look goo ...

Logitech Gaming Daedalus Prime Mouse

Logitech Gaming continues to expand upon its peripherals line, with each one looking to fit neatly into a breadth of gaming needs. Bui ...

toggle

Most Commented