toggle

AAPL Stock: 132.54 ( + 1.15 )

Printed from http://www.macnn.com

EU committee votes to allow ISPs to prioritize some Internet traffic

updated 02:46 pm EDT, Tue March 18, 2014

Priority traffic allowed if no other traffic is affected by boost

A group of European Parliament members today voted to give permission to ISPs to prioritize certain kinds of traffic (as specified by the ISP themselves) as long as the prioritization has no impact on other traffic in any way. The decision today allows companies to "offer specialized services of higher quality, such as video on demand and business-critical data-intensive cloud applications, provided that this does not interfere with the Internet speeds promised to other customers" according to the committee.

A wider vote on the entire proposal, which includes provisions to ban roaming charges in the EU, will be held with the entire Parliament on April 3. However, on the subject of Internet restrictions to customers such as blocking competitive services altogether, the decision claims that "measures to block or slow down the Internet would be allowed only in exceptional cases," such as "where specifically ordered by a court."

The move is opposed by consumer interest groups, such as the online rights group EDRi. It said that the ruling will result in "the same kind of monopoly that caused high mobile phone charges." It claims that if the result is not voted down by the full European Parliament, then "the result will be a weaker, poorer online environment, to the detriment of European citizens and European innovators."

With regards to the roaming-charge ban within the EU, the European Commission must evaluate "anomalous or abusive usage of retail roaming services" and develop a framework for acceptable charges in such a situation. All provisions of the preliminary vote are scheduled to take place before December 15, 2015, assuming it passes the full Parliament vote.




by MacNN Staff

POST TOOLS:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. Jeronimo2000

    Forum Regular

    Joined: 08-20-01

    "... as long as the prioritization has no impact on other traffic in any way"

    Isn't that total and utter BS and a contradiction in itself? If you prioritize something, then by definition something else gets less attention/time/bandwidth/etc.

  1. Sebastien

    Registered User

    Joined: 04-29-00

    The EU parliamentary system is a total fustercluck. Nothing but a bunch of corporate puppets deciding laws.

    Not that it's any better around here....

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook

toggle

Most Popular

Advertisement

Recent Reviews

Notti smart lamp from Witti

Perhaps you've already seen our review of the Dotti LED display from Witti Design. Meet Notti, Dotti's "sibling". Notti is a softb ...

Seagate Personal Cloud (2-Bay)

When it comes to backing up files, many users are now looking to the myriad of cloud storage solutions available. There is no doubt th ...

Leitz Icon Label Printer

When you say the words "label printer" to people, they either just really don't care, or they get incredibly excited. This is one o ...

toggle

Most Commented