toggle

AAPL Stock: 102.13 ( + 1.24 )

Printed from http://www.macnn.com

Apple leaked Nokia, NEC patent licensing terms, Samsung charges

updated 09:38 am EST, Wed March 5, 2014

Court filing points out double-standard in allegations

At the same time as it was accusing Samsung of leaking the same information, Apple publicly exposed the terms of its patent licensing terms with Nokia and NEC, Samsung remarks in its latest Apple v. Samsung lawsuit filing. In October, Apple filed a motion against Samsung as part of the original Apple v. Samsung case, alleging that Samsung's counsel -- Quinn Emanuel -- had inadvertently leaked licensing terms to Samsung executives, giving them an edge in corporate negotiations. In January the the District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that the latter was never sufficiently proven, and denied sanctions against Samsung, pinning the blame on counsel.

Samsung's new motion to compel reveals that Apple itself actually published the licensing terms to the Internet on October 10th, leaving them uncensored for four months. "Apple's and Nokia's scorched-earth approach to Samsung's inadvertent disclosure, and the amount of the concomitant fees Apple and Nokia incurred in pursuing those efforts, must be juxtaposed against the fact that Apple had simultaneously posted (and Nokia neglected to notice) this information on the Internet for all the world to see. The fee award should be reduced accordingly," the motion reads. Apple and Nokia are said to have tried to seal any mention of the October misfiling; Nokia is claimed to have wanted the seal to last indefinitely, on the belief that people who had already downloaded the docket without grasping its contents would be alerted to its importance.

While Quinn Emanuel may be most concerned with reducing its own penalties, Samsung could conceivably use the information to ask for sanctions against Apple. This is particular true if, as Quinn Emanuel says, Apple also accidentally leaked documents containing licensing terms for Samsung and Google. A court hearing is scheduled for April 8th.




by MacNN Staff

POST TOOLS:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. And.reg

    Mac Elite

    Joined: 02-22-04

    Figures, only Samsung is interested when Apple takes a leak.

  1. chas_m

    MacNN Staff

    Joined: 08-04-01

    Maybe they've found something, but I notice that Samsung has a habit of what is referred to in psychological terms "projection" in a lot of their counter-charges, so colour me skeptical for the moment.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 2030 projector

With high-definition televisions now the standard, 4K televisions becoming the next big thing, and plasma TVs going the way of the din ...

Life n Soul 8 Driver Bluetooth headphones

When it comes to music on the go, consumers generally have some options to consider when looking for the best experience. While Blueto ...

Pure Jongo T2 wireless speaker

Multi-room audio compatibility is a key metric for wireless sound systems these days. The entry cost into a house-spanning system can ...

toggle

Most Commented