Now AAPL Stock: The symbol you provided ("AAPL") doesn't appear to be registered
Cirrus creates Lightning-headphone dev kit
Apple supplier Cirrus Logic has introduced a MFi-compliant new development kit for companies interested in using Cirrus' chips to create Lightning-based headphones, which -- regardless of whether rumors about Apple dropping the analog headphone jack in its iPhone this fall -- can offer advantages to music-loving iOS device users. The kit mentions some of the advantages of an all-digital headset or headphone connector, including higher-bitrate support, a more customizable experience, and support for power and data transfer into headphone hardware. Several companies already make Lightning headphones, and Apple has supported the concept since June 2014. http://bit.ly/29giiZj

Apple Store app offers Procreate Pocket

The Apple Store app for iPhone, which periodically rewards users with free app gifts, is now offering the iPhone "Pocket" version of drawing app Procreate for those who have the free Apple Store app until July 28. Users who have redeemed the offer by navigating to the "Stores" tab of the app and swiping past the "iPhone Upgrade Program" banner to the "Procreate" banner have noted that only the limited Pocket (iPhone) version of the app is available free, even if the Apple Store app is installed and the offer redeemed on an iPad. The Pocket version currently sells for $3 on the iOS App Store. [32.4MB]
Porsche adds CarPlay to 2017 Panamera
Porsche has added a fifth model of vehicle to its CarPlay-supported lineup, announcing that the 2017 Panamera -- which will arrive in the US in January -- will include Apple's infotainment technology, and be seen on a giant 12.3-inch touchscreen as part of an all-new Porsche Communication Management system. The luxury sedan starts at $99,900 for the 4S model, and scales up to the Panamera Turbo, which sells for $146,900. Other vehicles that currently support CarPlay include the 2016 911 and the 2017 models of Macan, 718 Boxster, and 718 Cayman. The company did not mention support for Google's corresponding Android Auto in its announcement. http://bit.ly/295ZQ94

Apple employees testing wheelchair features
New features included in the forthcoming watchOS 3 are being tested by Apple retail store employees, including a new activity-tracking feature that has been designed with wheelchair users in mind. The move is slightly unusual in that, while retail employees have previously been used to test pre-release versions of OS X and iOS, this marks the first time they've been included in the otherwise developer-only watchOS betas. The company is said to have gone to great lengths to modify the activity tracker for wheelchair users, including changing the "time to stand" notification to "time to roll" and including two wheelchair-centric workout apps. http://bit.ly/2955JDa

SanDisk reveals two 256GB microSDXC cards
SanDisk has introduced two 256GB microSDXC cards. Arriving in August for $150, the Ultra microSDXC UHS-I Premium Edition card offers transfer speeds of up to 95MB/s for reading data. The Extreme microSDXC UHS-I card can read at a fast 100MB/s and write at up to 90MB/s, and will be shipping sometime in the fourth quarter for $200. http://bit.ly/294Q1If

Apple's third-quarter results due July 26
Apple has advised it will be issuing its third-quarter results on July 26, with a conference call to answer investor and analyst queries about the earnings set to take place later that day. The stream of the call will go live at 2pm PT (5pm ET) via Apple's investor site, with the results themselves expected to be released roughly 30 minutes before the call commences. Apple's guidance for the quarter put revenue at between $41 billion and $43 billion. http://apple.co/1oi1Pbm

Twitter stickers slowly roll out to users
Twitter has introduced "stickers," allowing users to add extra graphical elements to their photos before uploading them to the micro-blogging service. A library of hundreds of accessories, props, and emoji will be available to use as stickers, which can be resized, rotated, and placed anywhere on the photograph. Images with stickers will also become searchable with viewers able to select a sticker to see how others use the same graphic in their own posts. Twitter advises stickers will be rolling out to users over the next few weeks, and will work on both the mobile apps and through the browser. http://bit.ly/29bbwUE

Altivec88 Fresh-Faced Recruit Joined: Nov 12, 2013
Although I love the New MacPro's, this is exactly what I was afraid of. The New MacPro's pricing is out of whack. I normally upgrade my Mac Pro every couple of years and for the same money, I usually get a 150% to 200% speed increase for the same money. I currently have a mid 2010 12 core 2.66 that I paid under $5000. With this I got 3 PCI-e slots, and 4 drive bays. So after waiting almost 4 years to upgrade (because there was nothing compelling to upgrade to) I have to get something like a Roben-3Ts at $1899 just to have comparable expansion to what I have. That leaves me with $3100 for the MacPro which happens to be the cost of the cheapest Mac Pro. I don't care how improved the Xenon E5 is, I find it hard to believe that a 4 core chip is going to even come close to matching my current 12 core machine, never mind beating it by 150%.(Which I already had missed a two year upgrade cycle).
Although I really want to support Apple with these New MacPro's I can not justify to pay this kind of money for such a slight improvement. I am afraid that the MacPro is going to end up being a flop strictly based on the (expansion price + machine price)/performance relative to the previous generation machines.
James Katt Junior Member Joined: Mar 02, 2008
Macs Pros are NEVER inexpensive. A Top of the line 2010 12-core Mac Pro with all the options costs $10,000. The new Mac Pro 2013 is going to be the same. Expensive. But worth it for Mac lovers.
It is the same issue with cars. Sure, the Tesla is going to cost you $120,000 or MORE. But you can get a much cheaper BMW for $50,000 that can go just as fast.
The new Mac Pro's pricing is cheap compared to the cost of its components. An Intel Xeon E5 with 12 cores costs $5000 alone. Two AMD FirePro GPUs cost $7000. This and the rest of the computer is going to cost you less than $12,000. And it keeps its value well.
Thus the New Mac Pro is WORTH IT. Whether or not you can afford it depends on whether or not you have a good enough job.
prl99 Senior User Joined: Mar 24, 2009
@Altivec, I totally agree. I'm still waiting to see a reasonably priced TB2 RAID system. At this point, I don't see myself expanding past the included video cards but I definitely need storage.
Charles Martin Mac Elite Joined: Aug 04, 2001
You're making a number of presumptions that may turn out to be inaccurate. We don't yet know how fast the new Mac Pro is -- the entire system works together to produce true productivity, some benchmarks on the E5 don't tell the whole story (remember that Apple offloads a lot of work onto the GPU these days).
Secondly, my understanding is that a new Mac Pro can be configured with up to 12 cores (boy I'd hate to see the price tag on that).
Anyway, time will tell. But I think you're jumping to conclusions.
Altivec88 Fresh-Faced Recruit Joined: Nov 12, 2013
@ James. Like I mention I buy MacPro's every couple of years so I know they are expensive. I own many companies so money is not a problem, that does not mean I throw money around for no reason. When buying a system I look at the overall performance/dollar. That does not mean spend $10000 and get the best one. Like I said I paid $5000 to get a 12 core 2.6's almost four years ago because I found those to be the best price/dollar ratio. I understand your point if you don't have MacPro's already, but I have several that I would like to upgrade. So in order for me to upgrade, I need to see a substantial improvement without breaking the bank.
To use your analogy. If I bought a Tesla last year for $120,000 and this year they release a new one that looks cool and has a new fancy paint job, Its cheaper at only $110,000 but they removed the battery pack that you have to buy separately for $40 000 in order to run the thing and if you want a motor that matches what you already have, you have to upgrade that to the supreme model for $80 000 more. There comes a point where you go this is stupid, I think I'll keep what I got.
Altivec88 Fresh-Faced Recruit Joined: Nov 12, 2013
@ chas_m.... Your point that I am making a number of presumptions is a fair one. Like you, I am assuming that the 12 core is going to cost an arm and a leg. It could only be $500 more (LOL!) and my point would be less relevant.
Preliminary bench marks show that my 2010 12 core will easily trounce a 4 core E5. So with the proof and pricing information I have today, $5000 will get me something slower than what I got 4 years ago for the same money. You are right that the GPU will also play into this and I just don't know how much of an affect this will have or if my software will even take advantage of openCL in this way. I may be wrong on all of this and I will definitely keep an open mind, but I will not be upgrading my MacPro's until I have proof that a $5000 system will soundly beat what I already have.
Charles Martin Mac Elite Joined: Aug 04, 2001
Fair enough, Altivec88.
Spheric Harlot Clinically Insane Joined: Nov 07, 1999
Did everybody miss that this thing connects to MacBooks and Mac minis, too?
Magma have been the standard solution for laptop expansion for over fifteen years.
Joined: Dec 31, 1969
If I may ask, Altivec88, what do you use the PCIe slots for right now? Also what work do you do? Does it benefit from having more cores?
drbenru Fresh-Faced Recruit Joined: Jan 20, 2007
Thunderbolt expansions tend to be ridiculously overpriced. I blame Intel http://goo.gl/qQp9k I hope they don't stifle the growth of a great technology by being overly intrusive and protective of what can and cannot be done with it.
As for Magma, I haven't used their products, I don't know how good they are. I do know that Sonnet is a decent company and the products I've bought from them have been solid performers. They also make a thunderbolt chassis for 3 PCI-e slots in both desktop and rack mount and its way cheaper than magma. http://goo.gl/xIDbb the desktop version is under $1K and the rack mount is $1200. They are also providing a free upgrade to thunderbolt 2.
As far as value, James Katt is right, the components alone cost so much you are actually paying an excellent price for the system. I believe part of the high expected cost comes from the perception that thunderbolt is a PRO only technology and I hope that is not its intent. Now wether this new system gives you an actual performance increase is highly dependent on what you do and how your software works.
The fact that the new Mac Pro has 6 thunderbolt 2 ports makes me think that Apple fully expects many, if not all the new hardware "cards" to be standalone thunderbolt devices. And until that happens your PCI-e cards will have to go into chasis.
As it stands today, there are no bridge boards, raid boards or any other component level items like you can find for USB3 USB2 or even firewire. You can't get your own Thunderbolt to SATA III adapter or any other convenient thing like that. If you're not willing to pay and arm and a leg your only recourse is to hack around with components made for thunderbolt and make a kludgy setup that negates the benefit of simplicity that thunderbolt offers.
It makes no sense for one manufacturer to have a chassis that does the same thing, that probably uses almost the very same components and charges 100% more than the other. It seems the industry sees Mac PRO customers as big pots of gold to be emptied as fast as possible.
I'm dying to have more affordable thunderbolt components. I don't do high end stuff, but I was blown away when I borrowed a dual hard drive thunderbolt dock. I duplicate drives and install custom images for different machines and the speed of thunderbolt is awesome. And I can keep doing all my work from my MacBook Air if I could just afford to get multiple docks daisy chained. As it stands the docks cost me 6 times the price of the same two drive dock in USB3 ($35 vs $199). I cannot justify the expense for a 20% increase in speed (this price difference is same dock from same manufacturer thunderbolt vs usb3).