AAPL Stock: 126.44 ( -0.16 )

Printed from

Apple: Motorola tried to charge us 12 times more for SEPs

updated 11:00 pm EDT, Fri July 26, 2013

Royalty rate demand unsupported by previous deals, discriminatory

Apple has filed a rebuttal arguing against a Motorola Mobility appeal in a case where Apple pursued -- and again won -- a summary judgement victory against the Google-owned subsidiary's "unreasonable" 2.25 percent royalty on Standards-Essential Patents (SEPs). The filing claims that Google's pricing on the SEP license is 12 times higher that the deals it made with non-rivals for the same technology, an illegal offer under the Fair, Reasonable and Non-Dscriminatory (FRAND) rules. Apple has offered a more typical deal proposing about $1 per iPhone in royalties.

The dispute comes over the SEPs, which are essential technologies required by any smartphone maker. Apple has long maintained that Motorola Mobility and Google have broken their FRAND obligations by pursuing a common but "unreasonable" 2.25 percent of all sales royalty blanket license on SEPS, and using litigation as a weapon when licensees won't agree. Judge Barbara Crabb agreed, and dismissed without prejudice a lawsuit brought by Motorola Mobility over the matter.

In its filing to try and block an appeal, Apple said that the 2.25 percent royalty was more than 12 times higher than the amount Google charged other companies for the same license of the same technology. Google's higher royalty rate would amount to $12 for every iPhone, about 12 times more than what Apple already pays Motorola Mobility for use of other SEPs in the iPhone. Apple has countered the offer by saying it would pay up to $1 per iPhone for the SEPs in question, in an effort it said was intended to "buy litigation peace and move on."

Apple also noted in its brief that Google has entered into litigation with other companies over the proposed 2.25 percent royalty a total of eight times, and has yet to succeed in any of those efforts to find a judge or jury that agrees with the Google-owned company's arguments. Should the previous dismissal be overruled, Apple wants Motorola Mobility to offer an actual FRAND-compliant rate, and if it refuses have a judge formulate a rate. The company has been understandably hesitant to risk that outcome, fearing a precedent that may not even equal the rates it is currently getting.

Should the hearings fail to resolve the issue, Motorola Mobility's appeal of its loss will likely be heard sometime in 2014. Another Apple vs. Motorola Mobility case being appealed may actually go to trial first, with both parties asking a court to overturn Judge Richard Posner's dual-dismissal over a patent-infringement case the two companies sued each other over in 2012. In that case, Posner said neither company could show any material harm in their claims against the other, and questioned the entire viability of software patents.

by MacNN Staff





  1. SockRolid

    Forum Regular

    Joined: 01-21-10

    Google spent $12.5 billion in hard-earned advertising revenue to buy Motorola Mobility. For what, exactly? Anybody?

  1. hackdefendr

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 07-27-13

    @SockRolid -- Google bought Motorola Mobility for their huge collection of mobile technology related patents, and so they would have a phone manufacturer where they could have full control over the phones/tablets and to have the option of not having to rely on other phone manufacturers for building devices to their spec requirements.

    @MacNN Staff - Please stop using "Motorola" to describe "Motorola Mobility", you need to be specific and use either "Motorola Mobility" or "Google-Motorola" or even just plain old "Google". Why? Because there is a Motorola Solutions Inc. (where I work) and we are not affiliated at all with the mobility side. Using Motorola by itself is spreading bad information -- you have a responsibility to your readers to be as accurate as you can.

    kthx bye!

  1. The Vicar

    Junior Member

    Joined: 07-01-09


    More realistically, Google bought Motorola Mobility because they wanted a way to harass Apple, plus a fallback if it turned out that the open-source nature of Android ended up biting them in the a**, as in fact it did (that is, other Android device makers have started making the devices NOT use services which use Google's servers for ads/sales/whatever.)

  1. Charles Martin

    MacNN Editor

    Joined: 08-04-01

    hackdefendr: you're right. With no offense intended, we (meaning geekdom generally) tend to forget that there's still a Motorola that's not part of Google because you guys don't make news as much. :)

    I'll alert the staff to your comments. I can't promise anything, I'm not the guy who makes the rules, but I'll encourage them to avoid using "Motorola" as shorthand for "Motorola Mobility."

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Prong PWR Case

Ultimately there's one thing we all want from smartphone accessories; we want options. When it comes to keeping our iPhone charged, w ...

iHome iBT74 Color Changing Bluetooth Speaker

There's no reason why your tech can't look good while doing what it was designed to do. That's the reason that sports cars look goo ...

Logitech Gaming Daedalus Prime Mouse

Logitech Gaming continues to expand upon its peripherals line, with each one looking to fit neatly into a breadth of gaming needs. Bui ...


Most Commented