toggle

AAPL Stock: 110.37 ( -1.97 )

Printed from http://www.macnn.com

USPTO validates important aspects of Apple 'rubber-banding' patent

updated 04:42 pm EDT, Thu June 13, 2013

Should provide ammunition in cases against Samsung

Apple has told US District Judge Lucy Koh that the US Patent and Trademark Office is issuing a reexamination certificate, confirming four primary claims in the company's so-called "rubber-banding" patent, according to FOSS Patents. The patent describes the way iOS reacts whenever a user hits the bottom of a scrollable element. The USPTO once tentatively rejected claims in the patent, but Apple urged a court overseeing one of the company's lawsuits against Samsung to wait. Claim 19 in the patent helped Apple successfully sue Samsung for patent infringement last year.

It's believed that the certificate could give Apple an advantage when dealing with other patents it's asserting against Samsung. In the US, Apple is still dealing the aftermath of the 2012 lawsuit, an ongoing second, and a complaint at the International Trade Commission.




by MacNN Staff

POST TOOLS:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. bobolicious

    Dedicated MacNNer

    Joined: 08-15-02

    ...perhaps macnn might be improved by having a separate legal news site, for all those interested in the behind the scenes 'news'...?

    MacLegalista? MacLegalNN? MacCopyCatNN?

  1. Charles Martin

    MacNN Editor

    Joined: 08-04-01

    It's true we have guaranteed another four years (at least) of material ... :)

  1. coffeetime

    Senior User

    Joined: 11-15-06

    How about MaCourtista?

  1. Mike Wuerthele

    Managing Editor

    Joined: 07-19-12

    That's an interesting question, though. Court cases. How much attention to regular site readers pay to the articles devoted to them? The whole case? Just the verdict?

    There's actually a lot of material in between the start and finish we don't cover.

  1. Sukoshi

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 08-19-09

    If I make an extra hard drag on the muscles in my eyeballs I can skip right over a story I'm not interested in. This is *Mac*NN and until they change the first three letters I don't see why a story that's related to the company that makes Macs isn't worthy of the unlimited space available to this website. A lot of technical websites cover items that are connected to the companies they talk about by only a thin thread, yet it still interesting. What's funny is that you think somehow that this website is wasting your time, so you coming in and wasting a bunch of time to talk about how you don't want to read a story, when you could've just skipped it. Thank you for printing this article.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook

toggle

Most Popular

Advertisement

Recent Reviews

Blue Yeti Studio

Despite being very familiar with Blue Microphones' lower-end products -- we've long recommended the company's Snowball line of mics ...

ZTE Spro 2 Smart Projector

Home theaters are becoming more and more accessible these days, but maybe you've been a bit wary about buying a home projector. And h ...

MSI Geforce GTX 970 100ME

When Nvidia announced a new line of video cards in September 2014, many people thought things would continue to be business as usual i ...

toggle

Most Commented