AAPL Stock: 118.3 ( + 0.49 )

Printed from

Apple iPhone could have been dubbed the 'Tripod'

updated 05:59 am EST, Tue March 5, 2013

Former Apple marketing exec, Ken Segall, reveals alternative iPhone names

Former Apple marketing executive Ken Segall has revealed some of the possible names that the Cupertino giant had been mulling for its halo iPhone product line. Among the possibilities were 'Tripod,' 'Mobi,' 'Telepod,' and 'iPad,' reports 9to5Mac . Apple, of course, ultimately settled on the iPhone name, but was also forced to settle with Cisco for the rights to use it, after it was launched.

Segall also elaborated on the options, revealing why they were on the table. According to Segall, 'Tripod' was seriously considered because it was felt that it represented the three key pillars of what made the device unique. Apple ultimately placed a heavy emphasis on the iPhone's convergence of phone, iPod and Internet communicator in its sales pitch. The App Store phenomenon was not conceived of at the time and came over a year after its launch.

'Telepod' was also considered because of its futuristic play with the words 'telephone' and 'iPod.' It also represented the convergence of two devices, a technological trend that the late Steve Jobs publicly rejected ahead of the launch of the iPhone, perhaps to throw competitors off Apple's trail. 'Mobi' was considered a catchy shortened version of mobile that also had a 'personality.'

Finally, 'iPad' was also considered before it eventually was bestowed on Apple's breakthrough tablet. Steve Jobs revealed in the Walter Isaacson biography that the iPad was in development sometime before the iPhone was conceived. Apple was not sure how to pitch the iPad, but saw a market for the operating system if it was applied to a new class of smartphone.

by MacNN Staff




  1. FireWire

    Mac Elite

    Joined: 10-03-99

    not a good idea ;) ;)

  1. Gazoobee

    Forum Regular

    Joined: 02-27-09

    Whuh? (logic fail)

    " ... ultimately settled on the iPhone name, but not *before* it settled with Cisco for the rights to use it, *after* it was launched."

    This statement cannot be true as phrased. Apple could not have settled with Cisco before launch but also after it launched. For the record it was after, but whichever you are arguing, it cannot be both and certainly not in the same sentence.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Ultimate Ears Megaboom Bluetooth Speaker

Ultimate Ears (now owned by Logitech) has found great success in the marketplace with its "Boom" series of Bluetooth speakers, a mod ...

Kinivo URBN Premium Bluetooth Headphones

We love music, and we're willing to bet that you do, too. If you're like us, you probably spend a good portion of your time wearing ...

Jamstik+ MIDI Controller

For a long time the MIDI world has been dominated by keyboard-inspired controllers. Times are changing however, and we are slowly star ...


Most Commented