AAPL Stock: 109.89 ( -0.9 )

Printed from

Kucinich introduces RF regulation bill to Congress

updated 07:00 pm EDT, Mon August 6, 2012

Bill will force renovation of dated absorption metrics

On Friday, Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) introduced bill HR 6358 to Congress, which could spawn a new national research program to study cell phones and force the FCC and EPA to update the Specific Absorption Rate methodology for determining the potential damage that radio frequency emissions can cause. The bill, should it be passed, will "examine, label, and communicate adverse human biological effects associated with exposure to electromagnetic fields from cell phones and other wireless devices, and for other purposes."

New labels on phones mandated by the bill would require disclosure of RF radiation emission levels, legal limits, and goals for safe exposure. Unrelated to the bill introduction, sources say Congress is expected to ask the Government Accountability Office and the FCC to update the aging cell phone safety regulations later this week.

"It took decades for scientists to be able to say for sure that smoking caused cancer," said Kucinich in a statement. "During those decades, the false impression created by industry supporters was that there was no connection between smoking and cancer, a deception which cost many lives. While we wait for scientists to sort out the health effects of cell phone radiation, we must allow consumers to have enough information to choose a phone with less radiation."

To be called safe for public use, every cell phone sold in the United States must adhere to limits on the amount of energy absorbed from the phone-generated magnetic field. The absorption is measured in Watts per Kilogram. The current FCC-mandated limit is less than 1.6 W/Kg, at the closest range, and highest broadcasting power.

Last year, the World Health Organization's agency for cancer research reviewed studies and declared mobile phones a potential cancer hazard. Some international studies in the last decade show biological changes to cells at absorption levels less than the 1.6 W/Kg allowed by the FCC. Studies have been inconclusive about whether normal or even excessive cell phone use increases the risk of some types of cancer, particularly in the ear, jaw and brain. The unit of measurement the FCC uses has also come under some fire from researchers.

Several smartphones whose radiation absorption statistics are close to the current guidance may be affected by new laws. The HTC Desire comes in at 1.48 W/Kg, and the BlackBerry Curve 9350 at 1.5 W/Kg. Apple iPhones are somewhat farther from the maximum specification with the iPhone 4S at 1.11 W/kg, and the iPhone 3G at 1.38 W/Kg.

by MacNN Staff





  1. subego

    Clinically Insane

    Joined: 06-07-01

    Wrong forum. ;)

  1. aristotles

    Grizzled Veteran

    Joined: 07-16-04

    Right, so cellphones might pose a risk over a longer period of time but the US government is OK with irradiating people travelling through the US with much higher doses of radiation in those back scatter scanning machines?

    How about instead hiring trained scrutinizers like they have watching casino floors to detect suspicious behaviour before and after the security zones? They could combine that with some software to analyze video footage for possible threats. That would make more sense than subjecting law abiding citizens and tourists to "random" searches and scans.

  1. Chongo

    Addicted to MacNN

    Joined: 08-16-07

    Does this means the US government was doing the world a favor when it confiscated Tesla's lab and all his research after he died? Tesla was working on wireless power transmission. Had Tesla succeeded, there would be megawatts of RF saturating the world.

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: 08-06-01

    Oh good. I always like it when the government gets involved with science. Especially with mandating specific limits that, at best, are pulled from someone's a--.

    BTW, Rep. Kucinich, people know now that smoking can cause cancer. Yet people still smoke. And the only way you've been able to slow it down is to tax the heck out of cigarettes. Apparently people don't care that much. You think information like this would get anything more than a few people to put down their iPhones?

    Oh, and when are we going to hear how those bluetooth headsets are bad for us? Or how any headset can harm your hearing? Or talking on the phone could strain your voice? People do dozens a things a day that could kill them in one way or another. Doesn't stop them from doing it.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Polk Hinge Wireless headphones

Polk, a company well-established in the audio market, recently released a new set of headphones aimed at the lifestyle market. The Hin ...

Blue Yeti Studio

Despite being very familiar with Blue Microphones' lower-end products -- we've long recommended the company's Snowball line of mics ...

ZTE Spro 2 Smart Projector

Home theaters are becoming more and more accessible these days, but maybe you've been a bit wary about buying a home projector. And h ...


Most Commented