toggle

AAPL Stock: 112.34 ( + 4.62 )

Printed from http://www.macnn.com

Apple rebuffs UK court, seeks appeal on webpage 'ad'

updated 02:03 am EDT, Thu July 19, 2012

Unusual penalty in rare Apple loss sparks controversy

The same UK judge that offered a backhanded compliment in the form of a rare win for Samsung over Apple -- by declaring that the South Korean company didn't infringe on Apple's iPad design with its Galaxy 10.1 because the latter wasn't "cool enough" to be confused with the former -- saw his unusual penalty for Apple losing the case slapped with a challenge. The case will now be heard in a UK court of appeals.

Judge Birss, who granted the appeal and presided over the main trial, ruled that Samsung did not copy Apple's design sufficiently to be considered infringing, a finding that is in line with rulings in Australia and The Netherlands, but contrary to findings in Germany (where the Galaxy Tab 10.1N was introduced to work around the Apple ban) and thus far in the United States, where the tablet is under a temporary sales injunction.

Should the original ruling survive the appeal, Apple might be forced to pay for advertising in several UK newspapers as well as on its own website advising the public that Samsung's tablet does not infringe on Apple's designs. Thus far Apple's appeal covers grounds relating to the original claims of Samsung copying the design, but Apple would be within its rights to challenge the "penalty" Judge Birss imposed as unnecessarily punitive and an example of judicial overreach. Neither Apple nor the judges in any other previous or ongoing Apple-Samsung disputes has suggested a similar penalty for Samsung when it has lost.

UK courts have gained a reputation for being very reticent to find a company guilty of infringement. In such cases, violators are likely to be found guilty in only 15 percent of cases heard. Apple recently had three of its own patents declared invalid in another UK case against HTC.

The current preliminary injunction on the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in the US could be lifted or become permanent depending on the outcome of the upcoming US patent dispute trial, currently scheduled to start later this month. Observers believe Samsung has a weak case against Apple domestically, while Apple's claims have so far survived several tests, and the iPad maker is seen as likely to prevail overall. Outside the country, however, Apple's track record has been much more uneven.




by MacNN Staff

POST TOOLS:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook

toggle

Most Popular

Advertisement

Recent Reviews

Blue Yeti Studio

Despite being very familiar with Blue Microphones' lower-end products -- we've long recommended the company's Snowball line of mics ...

ZTE Spro 2 Smart Projector

Home theaters are becoming more and more accessible these days, but maybe you've been a bit wary about buying a home projector. And h ...

MSI Geforce GTX 970 100ME

When Nvidia announced a new line of video cards in September 2014, many people thought things would continue to be business as usual i ...

toggle

Most Commented