toggle

AAPL Stock: 441.97 ( + 8.71 )

http://www.macnn.com/articles/12/05/10/new.icons.grow.up.to.double.in.size/

Latest Lion update shows more preparation for Retina Macs

updated 12:48 pm EDT, Thu May 10, 2012

 

New icons grow up to double in size


Yesterday's OS X 10.7.4 update also brought with it more preparation for Macs equipped with Retina displays, observes AppleInsider. One example is the icon for TextEdit, which was previously a 209KB image measuring 512x512, but now takes up 1.7MB, and has doubled in resolution to 1024x1024. Other icons have grown in size without doubling in resolution; these include ones for Address Book (from 279KB to 484KB) and Dashboard (from 130KB to 226KB).

Apple has been quietly upgrading the graphics in Lion for some time. Some of the icons in the Lion beta, in fact, already measured 1024x1024. The v10.7.3 update upgraded different elements of the interface, such as cursors.

Macs are now the only major category of Apple products without any Retina displays. The iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch all have Retina models, even if some still lack the technology. The main obstacle for Macs is likely cost, since screensizes can range anywhere from 11 to 27 inches. Some developers, though, may also have to scale up their art assets to avoid pixelation.


by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -14

    yes....

    Some developers, though, may also have to scale up their art assets to avoid pixelation.

    Nothing like having to spend more developer dollars on a product because Apple has decided to s**** around with their OS yet again...

  1. Makosuke

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +3

    Others

    I haven't actually opened the assets to check, but the flag icon in the input menu looks slightly different to me as well; guessing they redid it while doubling the pixels.

    I've got to ask, though: I'm as big a proponent of high-dpi displays as anybody, but who on earth runs their icons at 512px on a modern-density screen? They look comically large on my 27" iMac, and on an 11" MBA, the current pixel density leader in the lineup, you can fit exactly two of those icons on the screen at once when you factor in margins and assorted UI chrome. Even by old people standards that's ridiculous.

    Since a 1024 icon on a pixel-doubled screen should be about the same physical size (actually bigger in most cases due to the fact that you don't need to fully pixel-double current Mac screens to get to retina-quality resolution), that seems absolutely preposterous for any real-world use case I've ever seen.

    Not that it really matters in any practical sense to end users (or even developers, since most artwork is probably vector anyway and what isn't can safely be left at 512 without ANYBODY noticing.

    In-app chrome is of course an entirely different matter. I actually hope that some companies release mini-chrome versions so people with intermediate-sized screens aren't left with the option of either too small or too large--the one disadvantage of going with only two optional pixel densities in the OS (in a perfect world, I'd be able to scale the UI up by about 30% on my 17" MBP).

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to overstate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming decline ...

toggle

Most Commented