AAPL Stock: 117.81 ( -0.22 )

Printed from

Google files for mistrial in ongoing Oracle court saga [U]

updated 07:45 pm EDT, Wed May 9, 2012

Oracle wants judge to rule on 'fair use' as a matter of law

[Update: judge denies Oracle motion, reduces Google liability] As expected, Google has petitioned Judge William Alsop for a mistrial following the jury's refusal to rule on a crucial matter in phase one of its trial versus Oracle. Near-simultaneously, Oracle filed its response to suggest that the judge rule on the "fair use" question that the jury couldn't agree on. Neither Google nor Oracle has responded to its counterpart's filing with the court.

Google's motion was relatively simple in its request for a mistrial and new trial based on the jury being unable to come to a complete and unanimous decision in all aspects. Oracle also filed, but with three options for the court. Oracle's first option proposed that if the court agrees, then the judge will decide the issue of "fair use" that the jury failed to decide. A second option suggests that both Google and Oracle waive a jury trial on all remaining issues. The judge would be the final arbiter of the case if Oracle's second option is selected. Option three proposes that Oracle waits until the judge hears the existing judgement as a matter of law that Oracle filed earlier in regards to the fair use motion.

[Updated] Judge Alsop rejected all three options presented by Oracle this evening, saying that "it wouldn't be fair." Alsup hasn't yet ruled on Google's request for a mistrial. Google faces one remaining count of infringement, based on the nine lines of rangeCheck code in duplicated in Android by Joshua Bloch.

The core of Oracle's argument is the repeated re-use of Oracle copyrighted code. Google is claiming a "fair use" defense versus the infringement claims. Oracle originally demanded $2 billion in Java licensing fees for Android, but have been instructed that they would not be awarded that much and to request less. Judge Alsop read documents from Google last week in court that prove that the Android division is losing money.

by MacNN Staff



  1. LenE

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Wait a minute

    Not that I'm a fan of Oracle, but why is he saying it wouldn't be fair to Google for him to resolve the "Fair Use" defense as a matter of law? I mean, the jury already found Google guilty of infringement. The case for fair use has a non-commercial requirement, which the judge has already ruled that Android is a commercial product of Google. That throws out "Fair Use".

    By ignoring the legal requirements and not ruling as a matter of law, he isn't being fair to Oracle, who convinced the jury that Google had infringed. Throwing out the whole trial and going for Google's proposal just gives more time for them to infringe with impunity, while they work on more ways to confuse the next jury.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Ultimate Ears Megaboom Bluetooth Speaker

Ultimate Ears (now owned by Logitech) has found great success in the marketplace with its "Boom" series of Bluetooth speakers, a mod ...

Kinivo URBN Premium Bluetooth Headphones

We love music, and we're willing to bet that you do, too. If you're like us, you probably spend a good portion of your time wearing ...

Jamstik+ MIDI Controller

For a long time the MIDI world has been dominated by keyboard-inspired controllers. Times are changing however, and we are slowly star ...


Most Commented