toggle

AAPL Stock: 562.29 ( -3.03 )

Apple adopts majority voting on board members

updated 03:15 pm EST, Thu February 23, 2012

Company bows to shareholder pressure


Apple has agreed to adopt majority voting on the board of directors at today's annual shareholders meeting, reports say. Shareholders actually voted in favor of the measure last year, but at the time, the company chose to ignore the outcome. This year's reversal is said to stem from pressure by the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), the US' biggest public pension fund. The renewed measure was also sponsored by CalPERS.

Apple initially opposed it, but conceded before a vote could take place, which was again expected to pass. Under the terms of new rules any Apple board member who doesn't get majority shareholder support must resign. The change will take effect at next year's shareholders meeting.

Within the last two years Calpers has reportedly pushed 77 US companies into adopting majority voting, and is working on another 17 companies. It owns 0.26 percent of Apple, worth roughly $1.4 billion. "It’s vitally important that a company the size and importance of Apple is not lagging behind on governance," says the fund's head of corporate governance, Anne Simpson. "A high standard of governance will underpin their future success."


by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. gprovida

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2006

    +6

    Evidence?

    There is no evidence that Apple governance is improved with this rule. Its past governance seems to demonstrate great success. So Apple adopting what a majority of its stockholders want makes sense, but that this is critical to Apple's future success is entirely speculative.

  1. bleee

    Mac Enthusiast

    Joined: Mar 2002

    +7

    Picked apart

    Apple will be an HP in 5 - 10 years.... Share holds these days lack any kind of long term vision and planning they just want to make a quick buck anyway they can. This is TERRIBLE!

  1. Bobfozz

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2008

    +5

    ONE good thing only

    Getting rid of bad directors such as the guy from Intuit... The rest? The shareholders are only in it for the money. That ALWAYS ruins it because they seldom know much else (i.e., the vast majority). One has to admire Jobs' vision, drive and unwillingness to let amateurs run things. These days is a shareholder sells his stock, purchased a while back, he is making seriously good money, more than any bank will pay by a long shot. Apple is one of the few Hi-tech stocks that is worth investing in.

  1. prl99

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2009

    +3

    owns 0.26 percent of Apple

    I guess someone who owns that much Apple stock needs to be heard. In other words 1 out of 400 can make a big enough stink to get something changed. Talk about minority power.

  1. DaJoNel

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2010

    +5

    umm

    This won't end well.

  1. FireWire

    Mac Elite

    Joined: Oct 1999

    +7

    shareholders...

    they don't know S***.. I think Apple knows what it's doing without having to listen to some ungrateful dumb@ss.. shareholders are no experts, they are people like you and me..

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -3

    Re: ONE good thing

    The shareholders are only in it for the money. That ALWAYS ruins it because they seldom know much else (i.e., the vast majority).

    Yeah, they only own the company. Why should they have any say at all?

    One has to admire Jobs' vision, drive and unwillingness to let amateurs run things.

    Good god people, you really have no clue do you? First, they aren't trying to run anything. Where is it that it says calpers wants a seat on the board, or wants to define the specs of the iPad 3. This is about governance! Stockholders choose a board to oversee the company, who, In Turn, elects the CEO. Apples rules on the board basically meant that unless someone actuall ran against bill Campbell, say, it wouldn't matter if he only got two votes out of 600 million, he'd stay on the board. This way, we can actually vote him out.

    The alternative is for calpers or someone to stick their own guy up against him. Would you rather have that? NO! So, in fact, this is a GOOD thing.

    Man, for people who always proclaim they love how apple moves forward, you ll seem so scared of any change.

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -1

    Oh

    if apple doesn't want to put up with greedy shareholders and interlopers and such, they can just buy back all the stock and go private.

    Oh, and you talk of greedy shareholders, yet apple is raking in 30% margins and you're ok with that. Seems like the company is greedy too. Oh, I know, they'd sell for cost plus a penny, if not for those greedy shareholders.

  1. localnet

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2005

    0

    Reading these comments...

    One can only surmise that the Marxist indoctrination has worked. Oy, this is not the country I grew up in!

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

dcx

vccxv dfgdfgdfg ...

dfdsfsdfds'dfgdf

dsfdsfdsfdgdfgdfgdfgdfgdfgdfgdfgdfgdg ...

Today

Today Test Monady Today Test Monady ...

toggle

Most Commented