AAPL Stock: 118.3 ( + 0.49 )

Printed from

Shijiazhuang officials confiscate iPad 2s in reseller raid

updated 09:35 am EST, Mon February 13, 2012

Could signal escalation in Apple vs. Proview

Officials in the Chinese city of Shijiazhuang raided an unnamed Apple reseller over the weekend, reports claim. In all 45 iPad 2s are said to have been confiscated; despite the limited scope of the raid, Chinese news sources indicate that a number of other vendors have decided to hide their iPad stock rather than risk losing it. Shoppers should nevertheless still be able to buy iPad 2s from official and unofficial sources in the city.

The raid is connected to a trademark dispute brought against Apple by Proview Shenzhen. The latter is seeking up to $1.6 billion in damages, arguing that while Apple bought an iPad trademark from Proview Electronics in 2006, the purchase didn't include the Chinese rights belonging to Proview Shenzhen. A Beijing IP and IT lawyer, Stan Abrams, contends that Proview has a strong case, and suggests that cities beyond Shijiazhuang may act on their own.

"Proview has apparently filed an enforcement application with the Beijing Administration of Industry and Commerce (AIC) [and has] a pending appeal to the High Court on a Shenzhen contract-based lawsuit that Proview won at the lower level, and a trademark infringement case that Proview filed in Shanghai," he says. "Since Proview is the legal owner of the iPad trademark in China and, as far as we know, Apple has no good evidence that Proview filed the trademark in bad faith over a decade ago, it certainly looks good for Proview in both cases, particularly the one in Shanghai.

"Local AICs [as federal outfits] have the authority to handle intellectual property infringement cases that involve trademark and unfair competition. In the case of the iPad dispute, we are dealing with trademark infringement.

"What can the AIC do? It can raid premises, seize documents, equipment, products and counterfeit marks, and it can halt activity and lock down businesses. Once AIC makes a decision about infringement, it can order fines (these go to the government, not the trademark owner), revoke business licenses, and mandate a public apology."

by MacNN Staff



  1. Eldernorm

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Crazy china

    Yea, the parent company sells the trademark but the small local company gets to sue Apple for billions ??? Maybe that is the same reasoning used to put toxic junk in baby milk powder. It doesn't harm me so it must be OK for you...

    China, only the government bought politicians have the real power.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Ultimate Ears Megaboom Bluetooth Speaker

Ultimate Ears (now owned by Logitech) has found great success in the marketplace with its "Boom" series of Bluetooth speakers, a mod ...

Kinivo URBN Premium Bluetooth Headphones

We love music, and we're willing to bet that you do, too. If you're like us, you probably spend a good portion of your time wearing ...

Jamstik+ MIDI Controller

For a long time the MIDI world has been dominated by keyboard-inspired controllers. Times are changing however, and we are slowly star ...


Most Commented