AAPL Stock: 117.81 ( -0.22 )

Printed from

Obama administration says it would block SOPA as-is

updated 04:00 pm EST, Sat January 14, 2012

Obama White House says SOPA DNS changes won't work

The Obama administration in a direct response on Saturday hinted it would veto any version of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), and by extension the Protect IP Act (PIPA), that included domain name blocking. The White House statement said that any proposal had to be narrowly focused on clearly criminal activity and "must not tamper" with the DNS system that translates web domains to IP addresses. Officials wanted "sound legisltation," but saw a bill like SOPA as compromising Internet security efforts like DNSSEC without solving the real problem.

"Our analysis of the DNS filtering provisions in some proposed legislation [like SOPA and PIPA] suggests that they pose a real risk to cybersecurity and yet leave contraband goods and services accessible online," the administration said. "We must avoid legislation that drives users to dangerous, unreliable DNS servers and puts next-generation security policies, such as the deployment of DNSSEC, at risk."

The governors instead argued that the public should be offering suggestions as to how to combat piracy, not just how to stop bills that might go too far. Any measure put forward had to embody stereotypically American values of "free expression, privacy, security and innovation."

An Obama White House response comes somewhat late and possibly as a reactionary move, as both SOPA and PIPA backers had volunteered to drop DNS blocking in order to get the measures passed. However, it also takes the steps off the table for any future bill as potentially leading to censorship and compromising US security. Advocacy groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation have suggested that the two bills as a whole shouldn't be passed given the lack of oversight.

Either bill was introduced quietly and is generally though to have come at the requests of labels and studios themselves that wanted piracy stopped at all costs. Early hearings on SOPA glossed over security and civil liberty issues, and many of those at the hearing had either only heard of DNSSEC for the first time at the gathering or admitted that they knew little of how it would work.

by MacNN Staff



  1. MXBrando

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Not an English major, I swear...

    ...but the Obama administration is clearly not "reactionary," which means right-wing. You meant to say their response comes somewhat late and possibly as a reaction...

    Also, that last paragraph starts out oddly.

    As for the content, I can tell you that, from the get-go, the Administration has quietly threatened to veto SOPA in its present form. Credit for it now being a public threat goes to the organized protests. I hope to see MacNN going dark on Wednesday.

  1. GopherAlex

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Let's be honest

    Either SOPA is not odious enough, or its backers are behind on their campaign donations.

  1. thnikkaman

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Good for Obama.

    I'm not a fan of Mr. President, but if he vetoes SOPA that may be all it takes for him to change my mind about who I'm voting for in November.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Ultimate Ears Megaboom Bluetooth Speaker

Ultimate Ears (now owned by Logitech) has found great success in the marketplace with its "Boom" series of Bluetooth speakers, a mod ...

Kinivo URBN Premium Bluetooth Headphones

We love music, and we're willing to bet that you do, too. If you're like us, you probably spend a good portion of your time wearing ...

Jamstik+ MIDI Controller

For a long time the MIDI world has been dominated by keyboard-inspired controllers. Times are changing however, and we are slowly star ...


Most Commented