AAPL Stock: 118.3 ( + 0.49 )

Printed from

EMI sues ReDigi for trying to resell digital music

updated 08:20 pm EST, Sat January 7, 2012

EMI accuses ReDigi of music piracy

Music label EMI is now known to have sued fledgling service ReDigi for its strategy of reselling downloadable songs. New details obtained by CNET showed that EMI unusually didn't object to the doctrine of first sale, which only lets a seller collect income with the initial purchase, but rather the origins of the MP3s and other music. ReDigi isn't selling the music from paid sources like iTunes, EMI said, and by extension isn't selling legal copies.

Niether side has commented so far.

Although not fully tested in court, reselling digital music brings up numerous clear problems. Even if a one-for-one copy, there's no guarantee that the original buyer has deleted the track, letting them profit from the resale without the handover that would be needed for a CD. Likewise, the new owner isn't under any obligation to resell to friends and could pirate as much as they like.

Music sharing has a number of legal, if considerably more restricted, workarounds. Apple's iTunes Match and Home Sharing let users grant a handful of people access to a shared account provided that person is comfortable with handing over login details. Google Music has a feature that lets buyers give friends one free, complete listen of a song or album they've bought if they're inside the other's Google+ circle.

by MacNN Staff



  1. brainiac

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Tired of the reselling argument

    I am tired of hearing about the argument that people might sell the track but not delete the song. If I buy a CD, I can rip the music and then sell the CD without deleting the ripped versions. If I want to give copies to my friends (not saying I would), I could do that as much as I want (but not legally).

    If music is watermarked and the sales sites track how many times a particular track is sold, you should be able to have a legit resale site. Based on the information presented in this story, it seems like EMI has a valid argument if people are selling ripped versions from sources like CDs.

  1. myramoki

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Bigger than just CDs

    This issue is a bigger than just CDs. It involves every kind of digital product out there. Digital books, games bought on Steam, movies purchased on iTunes, etc. The idea of reselling a product that only cost a dollar (in the case of a music track) seems a little silly, but when you pay $40-50 for a game on Steam and your done with it, can you sell it? Or what about a digital book? I can see a potentially large market in these 'used' items, but content publishers are going to fight this tooth and nail. They want no used marketplace. Imagine if you couldn't sell your car? Thats what they want.

    Admittedly, digital products lack the physical nature that make it impossible to have your cake and eat it to. But then they should be priced accordingly. Why should I pay the equivalent price for a digital book, as I would for a physical one, when the digital book contains no resell value.

    The best I could hope for from this trial is that it might manage to set a precedent for what is required to make the sell of 'used' digital goods a reality.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Ultimate Ears Megaboom Bluetooth Speaker

Ultimate Ears (now owned by Logitech) has found great success in the marketplace with its "Boom" series of Bluetooth speakers, a mod ...

Kinivo URBN Premium Bluetooth Headphones

We love music, and we're willing to bet that you do, too. If you're like us, you probably spend a good portion of your time wearing ...

Jamstik+ MIDI Controller

For a long time the MIDI world has been dominated by keyboard-inspired controllers. Times are changing however, and we are slowly star ...


Most Commented