AAPL Stock: 118.2 ( -0.68 )

Printed from

Filesharing service sues Warner Bros. for copyright fraud

updated 02:45 pm EDT, Tue September 13, 2011

Claims Warner removed 100s of files it didn't own

The battle over software and video piracy took a turn yesterday when a Florida file hosting service sued Warner Brothers for allegedly engaging in copyright fraud and abuse of anti-piracy laws. Hotfile accuses the Warner Bros. of using the hosting company's anti-piracy tools to remove titles the studio doesn't own, including open source software. Hotfile is asking a court to make it whole for the losses they claim Warner Bros. caused.

The suit is in response to a ruling in a related case. This spring, Warner joined with four other studios and the Motion Picture Association of America to sue Hotfile for facilitating illegal file transfers. Two weeks ago, a judge ruled that Hotfile must release detailed information about its users and affiliates. Hotfile's countersued yesterday, alleging copyright fraud.

A spokesman for Hotfile claims the studio was warned repeatedly about using the site's anti-piracy mechanisms to remove content that Warner did not own. Hotfile developed the tool to allow copyright holders to protect their intellectual privacy. The company says Warner went far beyond the intended use, removing open source and public domain titles, and even game demos. Each time Hotfile's Special Rightsholder Account (SRA) is used, the account holder must certify "under penalty of perjury" that it is the authorized legal representative of the copyright owner and "has a good faith belief" that the use of the material has not been authorized.

For example, while claiming to remove files that are copies of the movie The Box, Warner removed several files related to the alternative cancer treatment book "Cancer: Out Of The Box," by Ty M. Bollinger. Another title deleted by Warner was "The Box that Saved Britain," a production of the BBC, not Warner.

Hotfile claims that Warner removed hundreds of files wrongfully. For example, when the studio removed pirated copies of the its movie "The Box," it also deleted a BBC production titled "The Box that Saved Britain" and several files related to an alternative health book, "Cancer: Out Of The Box," by Ty M. Bollinger. Hotfile alleges that this demonstrates a pattern of abuse of the copyright enforcement tool and a violation of its terms with the studio.

In addition to the monetary damages, Hotfile is seeking a permanent injunction that would force the studio to review each file individually.

Hotfile also claims that the studio has a financial incentive for its actions. A number of the files that were taken down had been the subject of a proposed affiliate relationship, which would have replaced the movies served by Hotfile with links to sites where the films could be purchased.

Hotfile's lawsuit and the original case that seems to have prompted it are both ongoing. [via Torrent Freak]

by MacNN Staff



  1. Makosuke

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Fire with fire

    Hotfile, Fileserve, and their ilk are basically a hive of scum and villainy profiting from illegal downloads of just about everything--their entire business model is pretty much trying to convince people to pay them a monthly fee to save time when downloading illegal p***.

    However, WB and the other major studios are only slightly better; instead of profiting from people doing illegal and morally questionable things, they sue the living daylights out of innocent people in the pursuit of an unfettered and disproportionate assault on those same morally questionable folks. They also destroyed US copyright law for good measure, and have eviscerated Fair Use through the abhorrent DMCA.

    So while I have no sympathy whatsoever for Hotfile, I have just as little for Big Entertainment, and I support them 100% in their attack on WB--any damage they do, however minor, is well-deserved.

  1. Flying Meat

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Git 'em!

    WB just asked to make the option to delete material much harder for themselves. Formal itemized letters of intent and agreement from WB and the file services should be required prior to action on an agreed upon future date.

    WB just drove their costs up.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Ultimate Ears Megaboom Bluetooth Speaker

Ultimate Ears (now owned by Logitech) has found great success in the marketplace with its "Boom" series of Bluetooth speakers, a mod ...

Kinivo URBN Premium Bluetooth Headphones

We love music, and we're willing to bet that you do, too. If you're like us, you probably spend a good portion of your time wearing ...

Jamstik+ MIDI Controller

For a long time the MIDI world has been dominated by keyboard-inspired controllers. Times are changing however, and we are slowly star ...


Most Commented