AAPL Stock: 117.81 ( -0.22 )

Printed from

Sprint-backed study says AT&T, T-Mobile deal would lose jobs

updated 04:05 pm EDT, Thu September 1, 2011

Sprint says ATT claims of merger job growth false

Sprint went on the offensive Thursday and endorsed a study (below) challenging AT&T's claims that buying T-Mobile would create jobs. The 'independent' study, handled by UC Irvine Economics professor and Center for Economics and Public Policy director David Neumark, rejected the idea that the capital investments made by AT&T would lead to more jobs after a merger. Neumark claimed that too much of AT&T's argument centered on the $8 billion it would invest into the combined network, which depended mostly on the assumption that T-Mobile would spend less than that amount on its network.

The figures ignore what happens if T-Mobile has to lower its own capital expenditures, something the FCC had already been told would likely happen. If the net overall investment went down by $5 billion, the combined company could shed 34,000 to 60,000 jobs, the professor estimated.

Neumark went on to cite AT&T's traditional record with takeovers and mergers. The carrier would have lost 107,000 "job-years" compared to what would have happened with the firms being independent. Sprint jumped in to note that AT&T has told investors it would need to cut staff through "rationalizing operations" and eliminating redundant positions. Many, if not most, corporate mergers involve cutting jobs as there is invariably overlap.

AT&T in an expected response claimed it was a "woefully flawed" study that made bad assumptions, such as that T-Mobile would still invest at a similar rate with Deutsche Telekom handing over control to AT&T. It reiterated a promise earlier in the week that it would "bring back" 5,000 call center jobs and keep those that might otherwise have to go.

Both sides have motivations that skew the results. Sprint had commissioned the study, and much like similar strategies from Microsoft, may have framed the study for Neumark to guarantee that it gets the results it wants.

AT&T, however, has been making promises that have increasingly come under fire. It may have sabotaged its own chances after an accidentally unredacted FCC filing uncovered that it only needed $3.8 billion of its own money to reach 95 to 97 percent LTE coverage, not the $39 billion buyout of T-Mobile. The Department of Justice decided not to hold out for an FCC ruling and sued to block the merger as it believed the consequences of knocking out a major competitor trumped any claims AT&T made to clinch the takeover. [image via AFP]

by MacNN Staff



  1. lamewing

    Joined: Dec 1969


    AT&T's History

    AT&T's history speaks for itself. Lies and more lies. I don't believe a word of AT&T's spin on this merger.

  1. testudo

    Joined: Dec 1969



    AT&T isn't AT&T from before. Cingular bought AT&T, not the other way around. They just decided to take the name. Therefore, their history is immaterial since they ceased to exist.

  1. testudo

    Joined: Dec 1969



    Of course it will cost jobs. That's one of the main advantages of a merger, idiots. You merge so you can consolidate your various departments and save money (as in slash workforce). This, in turn, saves the company a boatload of cash, which, of course, they pass along to the consumer with lower prices. (hahahahahahaha, oh, I thought I could get that last part out without cracking)

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Ultimate Ears Megaboom Bluetooth Speaker

Ultimate Ears (now owned by Logitech) has found great success in the marketplace with its "Boom" series of Bluetooth speakers, a mod ...

Kinivo URBN Premium Bluetooth Headphones

We love music, and we're willing to bet that you do, too. If you're like us, you probably spend a good portion of your time wearing ...

Jamstik+ MIDI Controller

For a long time the MIDI world has been dominated by keyboard-inspired controllers. Times are changing however, and we are slowly star ...


Most Commented