AAPL Stock: 117.81 ( -0.22 )

Printed from

Amazon Appstore caught leaving Android app developers unpaid

updated 08:55 am EDT, Tue August 2, 2011

Amazon renegs on paying for promo apps

Mobile app developer Shifty Jelly in a disclosure revealed that Amazon is renegging on developer promises and refusing to pay developers for promos for the Appstore. Although its agreement officially states that it will pay developers 20 percent of the price of an app, Amazon told Shifty Jelly that it would pay nothing at all for promoting Pocket Casts ($3, Android Market) and that the attention from the free giveaway plus highlighted placement was reward enough. While the developer agreed as an experiment, it learned that it would have made $54,805 in one day from the 101,491 downloads if it had been paid according to Amazon's original agreement.

Amazon also decided without telling the developer that it would drop the price to 99 cents for some days afterwards. It also rewrote the description, including false information. The online retailer didn't factor maintenance into account and, because of the influx of users on Pocket Casts, is now actively hurting Shifty Jelly by forcing it to improve its server capacity.

The store itself lags behind Android Market and Apple's App Store, according to the account of events. App review times last up to two weeks, with pay coming later if at all. Analytics are described as poor, and there are no error reports to help diagnose bugs without direct user contact. Developers can't even remove apps themselves and have to ask permission.

Promises that going free for the one day would help proved hollow, Shifty Jelly said. Apart from a small increase in sales for the day afterwards, performance almost immediately returned back to the way it was before. The benefit was all for Amazon and could have been fatal for a company trusting Amazon for its success.

"I guess it's just lucky for us that this was an experiment, and that we don't make our full time income from selling Android apps, but rather from developing for iOS," the developer said. "That said, we want to make a clear stand here, so that Amazon doesn't take advantage of those less fortunate than us."

Amazon hasn't had an opportunity to respond to the allegations but has usually asked developers to keep these after-registration deals a secret. The company is known to often sell Kindle books and MP3 music at a loss to drive sales but, in those cases, still honors the payouts content creators would get if they were charging full price. The Appstore terms, where developers only get a fraction of their usual cut even if Amazon is faithful to what it promises on sign-up, suggest it may be counting on app writers' weaker positions to minimize its losses and turn apps into free advertising for the store.

Developers have been critical of Google's Android Market for poor app discovery but usually haven't complained about its approval and pricing strategies, which are deliberately kept loose and help speed the arrival of apps in the store. Apple's tighter approval process can lead to the two-week approvals of Amazon's shop but, unlike either, has typically been complimented for its greater support of paid apps and better overall app discovery than most Android stores.

by MacNN Staff



  1. johncarync

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Amazon: I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further.

  1. hayesk

    Joined: Dec 1969



    Is this the choice that Android developers are talking about? You can either have lots of customers but not get paid, or have a few customers and get paid very little.

  1. facebook_Larene

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Aug 2011


    Something is wrong

    Two comments already on an article about Android, and nobody has yet blamed Steve Jobs or insulted Apple customers. What is going on?

  1. Inkling

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Amazon service

    Amazon's service tends to be remarkably one-sided. They're great if you're a customer, but they are far from great if you are a supplier. A friend who sold European-made toys there was treated badly. Publishers, particularly small ones, were being bullied until they were taken to federal court in Maine. Now they are mostly ignored. In this case an app developer doesn't get what he was promised. That's Amazon, and it'll almost certainly grow worse as Amazon gets bigger.

  1. testudo

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Re: Amazon service

    To go with one-sided, the story we're hearing is also one-sided (and so far a single report). If this same thing came out about Apple, that would be pointed out as sour grapes from a dissatisfied developer.

    And the guy says it was all plus for Amazon, negative for him. How is it a plus for Amazon, since they gave it away?

  1. nowwhatareyoulookingat

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Important fact

    Amazon did NOT reneg on their original deal. They offered the developer a new deal [namely, if the developer agrees to accept $0, Amazon would promote their app], WHICH THE DEVELOPER ACCEPTED BEFORE THE PROMOTION HAPPENED. The developer was not due to be paid that $54K. And the developer was paid as per agreement for the after promotion 'sale'.

    While I agree the developer was completely hosed, and that Amazon treated him [along with all other developers] like dirt, he did agree, in advance, to try out being treated like dirt to see how it felt.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Ultimate Ears Megaboom Bluetooth Speaker

Ultimate Ears (now owned by Logitech) has found great success in the marketplace with its "Boom" series of Bluetooth speakers, a mod ...

Kinivo URBN Premium Bluetooth Headphones

We love music, and we're willing to bet that you do, too. If you're like us, you probably spend a good portion of your time wearing ...

Jamstik+ MIDI Controller

For a long time the MIDI world has been dominated by keyboard-inspired controllers. Times are changing however, and we are slowly star ...


Most Commented