AAPL Stock: 113.29 ( + 0.37 )

Printed from

Tri-Edre introduces Clone X 4 for Lion and Snow Leopard

updated 10:00 pm EDT, Tue July 26, 2011

Now creates bootable backup clone drives faster

Although Apple's own Time Machine is a good and easy-to-use solution for doing backups of user data, there are tasks it cannot do -- such as create a bootable external drive -- which are sometimes vital for troubleshooting, boot drive maintenance or other kinds of data restoration. Tri-Edre has timed the introduction its latest version of Clone X 4, which is now compatible with both Lion and Snow Leopard, to the introduction of Lion -- allowing users an easy way to clone their existing Snow Leopard installs before upgrading.

In addition to offering full cloning and restoration features, Clone X v4 now copies hard links, metadata and extended attributes of files, and can create "minimal system" versions suitable for emergency boot disks, thumb drives and other limited space media. The program can also create clones that feature everything apart from user information, handy for creating bootable "images" of configurations to ensure uniformity in a classroom or network.

The new v4 is also faster than the previous version, up to 150 percent quicker. The user interface has also been refined to be simpler to use. The new version is a full 64-bit app and requires either Snow Leopard or Lion to operate. The program costs $29 to buy, and users of previous version of Clone X can upgrade for $19. A free trial mode is available.

by MacNN Staff



  1. enterix

    Joined: Dec 1969


    CCC or rsync are better

    Carbon Copy Cloner is much nicer for that. It is a nice shell over standard Mac/Unix tools such as rsync and bless. Works 100%.

  1. chas_m



    To be fair ...

    CCC and rsync don't have easy, one-button methods for creating minimal system disks, or "clone minus users" type images, and of course in the case of rsync/bless, 99% of users have ZERO interest in using the Terminal. For anything. Ever.

    I've never used Clone X, I use CCC ... but given the other features and reasonable price (cheaper than SuperDuper!), this definitely makes me want to check them out.

  1. tvalleau

    Joined: Dec 1969



    I own all three (CCC, Clone X, SuperDuper [and several more]) and the advantage to SuperDuper is that first clone times (copying to a blank destination drive) take about the same amount of time, SD is anywhere from 2X to 5x faster on subsequent passes... at least for me.

  1. robot prom

    Joined: Dec 1969



    Clone X is more expensive than Superduper by $1.05. Also, it's less powerful than Superduper and CCC. What's to love?

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

ZTE Spro 2 Smart Projector

Home theaters are becoming more and more accessible these days, but maybe you've been a bit wary about buying a home projector. And h ...

MSI Geforce GTX 970 100ME

When Nvidia announced a new line of video cards in September 2014, many people thought things would continue to be business as usual i ...

Wren V5US Wireless Sound System

If you're a music fanatic, chances are you are, by extension, a bit fanatical about what you listen to your music on. If you're like ...


Most Commented