AAPL Stock: 111 ( + 0.22 )

Printed from

Republican spectrum proposal cuts net-neutrality provisions

updated 11:35 pm EDT, Thu July 14, 2011

Terms would complicate unlicensed wireless space

A set of proposals drafted by House Commerce Committee Republicans in the US House of Representatives aims to overcome the looming spectrum crisis, however many of the authors' specific strategies have been met with criticism. The discussion draft includes new rules for spectrum auctions, licensed and unlicensed spectrum, and net neutrality for wireless networks.

The proposals recommend revamping the auction system to require bids to be taken on unlicensed spectrum, rather than limiting auctions to licensed bands. The FCC would be prohibited from allocating spectrum for unlicensed use if it the aggregate bids exceed the highest bid from a company attempting to use the same spectrum for licensed purposes.

The FCC would also be prohibited from setting any rules that limit the ability of the licensee "to manage the use of its network, including management of the use of applications, services, or devices on its network, or to prioritize traffic on its network as it chooses." Auction winners would also be entitled to ask for a waiver or adaptation for "any provision of law administered by the Commission."

The Republican authors explicitly describe companies such a Google and Microsoft as "free riders" that benefit from unlicensed spectrum without having to pay. Opponents to the draft legislation, such as Public Knowledge legal director Harold Feld, argue that unlicensed spectrum serves to benefit consumers and a wide range of companies, large or small.

"This confuses the nature of an exclusive license with the nature of unlicensed," Feld writes in a blog post. "Unlicensed spectrum acts as a resource available for all to develop. This encourages a particular type of development - notably for mass produced goods or low margin/high volume services. By contrast, licensing encourages the licensee to maximize the profitability of the spectrum, incenting the development of large scale networks that create sufficient return for the licensee."

Critics also point out potential conflict-of-interest issues with the terms allowing companies to draft their own rules after winning auctions for spectrum, rather than setting a consistent set of rules before the spectrum is put up for auction.

House democrats have already voiced opposition to the draft bill, though some organizations stand behind the proposals. Verizon Senior Vice President Peter Davidson quickly voiced satisfaction with the draft. [via Ars Technica and NationalJournal]

by MacNN Staff





  1. chas_m




    Republicans suck. That is all.

  1. facebook_Mayur

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Jul 2011




Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Polk Hinge Wireless headphones

Polk, a company well-established in the audio market, recently released a new set of headphones aimed at the lifestyle market. The Hin ...

Blue Yeti Studio

Despite being very familiar with Blue Microphones' lower-end products -- we've long recommended the company's Snowball line of mics ...

ZTE Spro 2 Smart Projector

Home theaters are becoming more and more accessible these days, but maybe you've been a bit wary about buying a home projector. And h ...


Most Commented