toggle

AAPL Stock: 562.29 ( -3.03 )

Artist investigated over spyware in NYC Apple stores

updated 07:45 pm EDT, Thu July 7, 2011

Secret Service investigating after store complains


A New York area artist found himself the subject of a Secret Service search warrant and confiscation after surreptitiously installing a program on NYC Apple Store computers that took pictures of users every minute and uploaded them to his server, Mashable reports. Apple contacted authorities after the artist, 25-year-old Kyle McDonald, staged an unauthorized "exhibition" of the photos at two Apple stores.

For his part, McDonald wanted simply to capture people's expressions as they used computers, hoping to provoke some thought about the relationship of people and the machines many of them now spend most of their time with. McDonald began by asking for and receiving permission from store security to take pictures within the store, including asking some customers permission to photograph them with a regular camera.

What he didn't get permission for, however, was the second stage of his experiment: installing programs on display computers that took pictures of the people using them and uploaded the results to McDonald's private server. As the Apple Stores wipe their computers every night, McDonald would have to re-install the programs each day. He eventually posted some of the results of the captures on a Tumblr blog, and earlier this month set up "an exhibition" of the pictures at the Soho and West 14th Street Apple Stores, again without permission.

Over the course of his "project," MacDonald set up roughly 100 machines to call his servers over three days, taking over 1,000 photos. It wasn't long before a Cupertino technician had figured out what was going on and traced the traffic from the store (which Apple monitors) back to McDonald's servers, using McDonald's own program. Shortly thereafter, four Secret Service agents (who handle cases of electronic fraud and wiretapping) appeared at his door and confiscated his computers, an iPod and two flash drives. They told the artist that Apple would contact him separately.

McDonald argues that he believes he has not actually broken any laws, and that the idea had a benign and genuinely artistic intent: to study the expression on the faces of people engrossed in computer use, who are generally not interacting with any humans around them. McDonald said he has not posted the source code for his program as he generally does with other projects, realizing that it could be misused, and will remove any photos in the project that the subjects ask to have removed.

While customers at an Apple Store -- surrounded by computers that are capable of taking pictures -- may not have a reasonable expectation of full privacy, authorities may have a different view of the activity of taking candid photos that the users could not have known about. To date, however, McDonald has not yet been charged and Apple has not yet contacted the young artist. McDonald hopes he will be allowed to return to the Apple Stores in New York City -- to buy replacements for the computers that were confiscated. [via Mashable]




by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. cvbcvb

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 2003

    +10

    Lawyer Up

    And his next project will be, finding a good lawyer...

  1. frankiec

    Junior Member

    Joined: Apr 2005

    +3

    zzz

    Hipster needs to get off his allowance and get a real job...because he's making the rest of us look soft and lazy.

  1. Bobfozz

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2008

    +6

    Doncha...

    wonder what kind of world these people think they are in? The guy is messing with stuff that isn't his, interfering with the lives of others, and we only have HIS word for it that after he gets all excited and gleeful that he won't do something more damaging. This guy makes life for other REAL artists even more unbearable. franklec is right, this twerp needs to get a job, maybe he will be washing dishes on Rykers.

  1. Makosuke

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +6

    Some people don't get it

    I'm willing to wager that this guy really was doing this as an artistic project, and probably thought it wasn't any different from photographing people in the store, which he already had permission to do. There's even an argument to be made that, since these people were in a public place which almost certainly has security cameras, they had no right to privacy to begin with.

    But that doesn't change the fact that the guy went around secretly installing software on computers that weren't his so he could secretly take pictures of people without their knowledge. If he honestly thought that this wasn't going to get people very, very upset, it's hard to call him anything but stupid. Maybe in England, where public surveillance has become the norm, this would fly, but at this point in time in the US it's still almost certainly illegal and unquestionably something people get angry about even if it isn't.

  1. Hillbilly Geek

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2006

    +3

    What part of this did he think was a good idea?

    Artists are self-absorbed, arrogant dweebs. I know, cause I are one. Sometimes, after administration of severe reality therapy, we grow out of it, somewhat. Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

  1. macnnoel

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2005

    +2

    15 mins of fame

  1. facebook_Ed

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Jul 2011

    -3

    Time Out, Time Out . . .

    Wait: you can surreptitiously INSTALL apps on Apple-Store Macs?? What—Planet—Does—Steve—Jobs—Live—On?? I’d always assumed that simply wasn’t possible, except by the employees.

  1. tundaman

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2010

    -1

    So...

    FBI/NSA are very curious about the "faces" made by an artist when dealing with it's work without human interaction, so they should return his computers with a program installed that take pictures of his daily activities, which by his line of thought would be very reasonable and completely innocent, right?

    What a moron!

  1. hayesk

    Professional Poster

    Joined: Sep 1999

    0

    This really isn't that bad.

    It's just a case of mistaken notion that a retail store is public. It's perfectly legal to take pictures of people in public. I can see how a lot of people would assume a retail store is public too. Using their computers though - yeah, I'd want to get Apple's permission first.

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +1

    Re: This really isn't that bad

    Why would anyone assume a retail store is 'public'? It is owned and operated by a private entity, for the business of said entity. Thinking a store is 'public' is like saying "Well, I thought that house was a public building. There's people in it all the time, so how can it be private?"

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented