toggle

AAPL Stock: 562.29 ( -3.03 )

AFL-CIO votes against Jobs' Disney board re-election

updated 01:25 am EDT, Tue March 22, 2011

Some shareholders question Jobs' attendance


The Walt Disney Company's annual shareholder meeting may prove more contentious than Apple's recent meeting, with some controversy surrounding the presence (and attendance) of Steve Jobs. A large shareholder group, Institutional Shareholder Services, has raised questions about Jobs' attendance at Disney board and committee meetings, and the powerful AFL-CIO union has announced it has voted against Jobs being returned to the board, according to a report from The Los Angeles Times.

The two organizations gave slightly differing reasons for their positions, both tied to attendance. The AFL-CIO explained that it felt that full-time CEOs for other companies, who have responsibilities to their own shareholders, are inevitably compromised -- unable to give their full attention and attendance to board meetings for another publicly-traded company.

A spokesman for the union said that Jobs' medical complications played a role in their decision by increasing his absenteeism from Disney meetings. Jobs, the largest individual shareholder at Disney, has attended fewer than 75 percent of board and committee meetings over the last three years.

The ISS has not recommended a vote against Jobs, but did question his ability to serve. While acknowledging Jobs' current leave of absence from Apple for medical reasons, the firm simply said that shareholders in Disney deserved more of an explanation as to why the company wants to retain Jobs on its board. ISS generally considers illness to be a valid reason for missing meetings, but said that Disney's decision to recommend Jobs' re-election despite "persistant absenteeism" was an issue: “Jobs’ poor attendance in three of the past four years, and recent leave of absence from his primary employer, raises questions about his ability to fulfill his responsibilities as a director of the company,” the firm wrote to its shareholders.

Jobs has held more than seven percent of Disney's stock, and served as a director on Disney's board since its 2006 acquisition of Pixar Animation Studios. Jobs was, at the time of the buyout, chairman and CEO of the company.

It isn't known if Jobs will attend the Disney shareholder meeting, scheduled for Wednesday in Salt Lake City. Jobs has joked on several occasions that he is not fond of shareholder meetings. A live audio webcast of the shareholder meeting will be available on Disney's corporate website. [via The LA Times]


by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. LenE

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2004

    +18

    Jobs is "tha Man"

    Apple is not unionized, and that's enough for the AFL-CIO to dislike about both Apple and Steve Jobs. He has wealth and runs organizations where individuals regularly meet and exceed high expectations, with commensurate rewards, which is another thing that the AFL-CIO really hates.

    Disney recommends Steve because Pixar saved them. Disney recommends him because he is the largest stock holder. His attendance is optional, he has pull and other means of communicating with the board.

    -- Len

  1. LenE

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2004

    +3

    And another thing...

    The AFL-CIO tends to keep score.

    http://www.nysun.com/opinion/steve-jobs-has-guts/48971/

    The second-largest teachers union (AFT) is under the AFL-CIO umbrella.

    -- Len

  1. facebook_Clarence

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Mar 2011

    +1

    AFL CIO

    They need to go home.

  1. sibeale1

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2006

    +3

    Business as usual

    AFL-CIO has a fiduciary obligation to its members to maximize the value of its holdings, and if they think the value f Disney would be higher without Steve Jobs on the board, it doesn't matter what Steve did in the past for Disney. However, like any other shareholder, all AFL-CIO can really do is vote their shares. AFL-CIO has influence on the board election only to the extent of their holdings.

  1. malax

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2006

    +4

    I wonder

    Who owns more shares of Disney, the AFL-CIO or Jobs himself?

    The argument about "full-time CEOs for other companies, who have responsibilities to their own shareholders, are inevitably compromised" is BS in this case. I'm sure there are too many other cases like this where the person in question owns 7% of the company. I suspect that gives Jobs incentives to care about Disney.

  1. LenE

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2004

    +2

    @malax & sibeale1

    Steve Job's stake in Disney is about 30 times larger than the AFL-CIO.

    Everyone should remember that the AFL-CIO is first a political organization, and secondarily a collection of unions. Their fiduciary duties are very much second place to settling scores with political opponents.

    Keep in mind, Jobs is not a conservative, and on most non-labor issues he is pulling in the exact same direction as the AFL-CIO. This is just an attempt to use their sway to spite a critic of their raison d'être.

    -- Len

  1. freddymac

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2010

    +1

    s**** the AFL-CIO and other unions............

    In todays economy they help the worthless keep there jobs when the true performers get let go because they have no seniority. Just a bunch of Crooks....... They have put more people out of work than they have helped. Look what they have done for the US auto industry, Steel industry and a never ending list. They are the reason that businesses are leaving the US. FTU's!!!!!

  1. TheSnarkmeister

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2007

    +3

    Explains a bit

    Many corporate boards function for years at a time without full attendance. The argument that Jobs wouldn't be there for some interim period is specious. Certainly Jobs health is of concern, but he is not only Disney's largest shareholder, but also the former owner of what has effectively become Disney's main economic engine, Pixar. No one, has more interest in Disney's success than Steve Jobs. It is absurd, the idea that a company's largest shareholder would be denied a seat on its board. Such positions, such activism, is a good part of the reason that support of unions is declining.

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +1

    yes

    That's it. It's all about some vendetta against Jobs. Why? Ah, who cares. It must be a vendetta against jobs. It must be. Jobs is that lame-a** liberal, having meetings with Obama and clinton before him. And he doesn't use union labor at their plants. Yep, that must be it too. I'm sure all the other people on the board are all union people, and disney is filled with union workers.

    Just another union against Steve. Man, it's like everyone's after this guy.

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +1

    @LenE

    And another thing...
    The AFL-CIO tends to keep score.


    Oh, and Steve doesn't keep score? Yeah, he isn't one to hold a vendetta. He certainly wouldn't pull an entire line of video cards out of a computer system because some company idiot pre-released some information. Nah, not steve jobs.

    And it certainly seems like you have as much against the AFL-CIO as they have against Steve Jobs. Not exactly objective on your side, it seems like.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented