AAPL Stock: 117.81 ( -0.22 )

Printed from

Apple says Microsoft hypocritical in App Store trademark war

updated 02:40 pm EST, Tue March 1, 2011

Apple calls out Microsoft on App Store trademark

Apple stepped up its language late Monday in a push to have a court ignore Microsoft's motion to dismiss an Apple filing for an App Store trademark. The iPhone creator directly accused Microsoft of hypocrisy and said it was trying to use the same argument it had rejected during the original fight over the Windows name. If Microsoft could argue that Windows was a proprietary name based on how most people used the term, it couldn't object when more people associated the App Store name with the iOS and now the Mac, Apple explained in the filing.

"Having itself faced a decades-long genericness challenge to its claimed Windows mark, Microsoft should be well aware that the focus in evaluating genericness is on the mark as a whole and requires a fact-intensive assessment of the primary significance of the term to a substantial majority of the relevant public," it said. "Yet, Microsoft, missing the forest for the trees, does not base its motion on a comprehensive evaluation of how the relevant public understands the term App Store as a whole."

The company added that many other mobile providers have gone out of their way to avoid using a term similar to App Store in their naming schemes. Microsoft uses services such as the Windows Phone Marketplace and Zune Marketplace, while Android Market, BlackBerry App World, the Ovi Store and others were consciously worded differently. It complained that companies were refusing to drop the similar use of the "app store" language owing solely to Microsoft's challenge.

Previous claims had gone to the point of suggesting that App Store was a deliberate play on Apple's corporate name to associate mobile apps with its products.

Microsoft has been hoping to have the trademark attempt tossed owing to its roots as "application store" and that the term is thus far too basic to be trademarked. Among the examples cited earlier, it mentioned that even Apple chief Steve Jobs had referred to "app stores" for Android in the generic sense, hinting that even he was inclined to use it generically.

Disputes over generic usage have been a staple of trademark in the past few decades as certain products, such as Coke, Kleenex, and Xerox, have been commonly associated with the type of product rather than a particular brand. Apple can't prevent common, non-commercial use but can try to prevent other companies from making similar references. [via TechFlash]

by MacNN Staff



  1. Parky

    Joined: Dec 1969



    Let's see, what generic terms do MS use?

    Internet Explorer
    Visual Studio

    All of the above are generic terms.

  1. Paul Huang

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Internet Exploder

    It's funny how browsers are named after cars:

    GMC Safari (a van from the 80s)
    Ford Exploder (1989) exception.
    Netscape Navigator predates the Lincoln Navigator.

  1. aristotles

    Joined: Dec 1969


    More generic terms used by MSFT

    Excel, access, outlook, publisher and expression just to name a few.

  1. nat

    Joined: Dec 1969



    ms should call is the prog store. they have programs right? apple has always had applications.

    Comment buried. Show
  1. ilovestevejobs

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Good for MS

    I hope this MS wins this since Apple is such a tool

  1. global.philosopher

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Just when you start to fel sorry for MS...

    they go and do this. After being kicked from pillar to post in the Mobile market you start to feel sorry for them and even wish them a tiny bit of success they go and remind us all why they are not be given any simpathy.

  1. DeezNutts

    Joined: Dec 1969


    lol the prog store

    I am not sure which way I want this to go, I think that its a valid concern (app store) and should be reviewed (the trademark).

    If Apple wins however I'm going to call it a done deal.

    lol at whoever said MS should call it the Prog Store.

  1. MorituriMax

    Joined: Dec 1969



    Apple makes an excellent point when they point out the generic nature of Microsoft's flagship product.

    Oh, wait, flagship isn't patented is it? I don't want to get sued.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Ultimate Ears Megaboom Bluetooth Speaker

Ultimate Ears (now owned by Logitech) has found great success in the marketplace with its "Boom" series of Bluetooth speakers, a mod ...

Kinivo URBN Premium Bluetooth Headphones

We love music, and we're willing to bet that you do, too. If you're like us, you probably spend a good portion of your time wearing ...

Jamstik+ MIDI Controller

For a long time the MIDI world has been dominated by keyboard-inspired controllers. Times are changing however, and we are slowly star ...


Most Commented