AAPL Stock: 118.3 ( + 0.49 )

Printed from

Motorola Xoom 'real' hands-on: not quite there yet

updated 09:30 pm EST, Wed February 16, 2011

Our Motorola Xoom hands-on from MWC

Mobile World Congress gave us the opportunity to try what should be the final version of the Motorola Xoom. While we got a live demo at CES under controlled conditions, we wanted to see how it would be in real life. Read on for Electronista's impressions and how well the final hardware will stack up against the iPad, its most obvious competitor.

The first thing you might notice is the weight. It's only a tenth of a pound heavier than the iPad, but it can subjectively feel heavier. We suspect that's due to the aspect ratio: at 16:10 versus Apple's 4:3, holding it in portrait mode makes it taller and puts a lot of the weight bias towards the back. Compare it to the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and it feels excessively heavy for the size, not to mention harder to grip the smooth surface.

There's no doubt that the construction is high quality, however: we tried the European silver model, and while it looks like a giant-sized original iPhone, the aluminum and glass give it a reassuring feel. Americans will only get black. Videos can look very good on the widescreen display given that there's far less rescaling to fit the video.

Android 3.0, of course, is a big step forward for tablets, at least those from companies other than Apple. We won't rehash the full feature set, but it's both much more optimized for the tablet space and brings some features that Apple could take a cue from: the visual app switcher and subtler tray area notifications, for example.

There are some definite problems in this initial release. We're not sure if the action bar (the top title bar) is necessarily the best solution for a tablet: it forces you to reach both the top and bottom of the screen when you're navigating around apps and the OS. It sometimes takes valuable space from the app, too.

More important appears to just be performance. Even on a Tegra 2 and using hardware graphics acceleration for the main interface, the Xoom feels atypically slow: it uses the same processor and core components as the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and LG Optimus Pad. We noticed a number of transitions, such as browser navigation and just in swiping through home screens. It's possible this particular tablet was facing a problem, but given that text and other less intensive tasks prompted almost instantaneous responses, we suspect something wasn't properly optimized.

Is it worthwhile? At CES it wasn't hard to be enamored with the Xoom, but now we're not so sure. There's no doubt that it has received a lot of care on its way to launch, but we're not convinced it's necessarily the best tablet. A Galaxy Tab 10.1 might not have as much of an upscale feel but makes more sense both out of speed and portability.

Moreover, any conversation about the Xoom now has to center on the price. At a minimum of $600 for a Wi-Fi only Xoom, it's a lot to ask if you don't truly need the 32GB of built-in space. And at $800 for a 3G model whose Wi-Fi is disabled until you pay for a month of service, it's just too hard to endorse. Android is supposed to be open, but it's not to the end user if they have no choice but to pay more than the advertised price to use the full hardware.

It's true that the device is more advanced than the current iPad, but it's only the current model. Apple's next iPad is rumored to run on its own dual-core processor and use dual cameras, negating much of the hardware difference. If Apple keeps prices and capacities the same, a competitive iPad 2 would cost $70 less -- and it would cost $100 less beyond that for those who only need 16GB.

We're eager to get a long-term review unit to see how it works in real-world conditions, and we suspect we would be happier with the Xoom at home than at a Barcelona show exhibit. But it's not quite the surefire tool to convert iPad users that Motorola portrays: with these prices and experiences, it's more for early adopters curious about Android or eager to avoid iOS. We like it, but when a tablet's attachment depends on people loving it, that might not enough.

by MacNN Staff



  1. facebook_Matt

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Feb 2011



    Weight for Xoom = 1.6lbs or 730g (Source: Wikipedia)
    Weight of 32GB iPad 3G = 1.6lbs or 730g (source: Apple iPad website)

    The Xoom 3G/4G model weighs exactly the same as the iPad 3G model.

    I have a hard time believing the rest of this article. We'll just have to wait until it's in stores. The Pro and anti Apple bias is too strong on tech blogs these days.

  1. chas_m



    Re-read the article, Matt

    Whether they are wrong about the 1/10th of a pound or not, the article CLEARLY says the weighty feeling comes from the weight *not being distributed evenly.*

    As for "bias," I don't know where you're getting that from: the article seems extremely even-handed to me, even giving the Xoom the benefit of the doubt in *several* areas, and finishes with "we like it [compared to the current iPad], but we don't know how it will stack up against the iPad 2." Oh yeah, that's TOTALLY biased. Not.

    My impressions, based on the photos and article, are these:

    1. That is one FUGLY home screen. Let's hope they come they come up with something better.

    2. Costs more (fact), and they said it seems slow. The latter might get fixed by the time it hits stores; the former won't be.

  1. wrenchy

    Joined: Dec 1969


    re: Fugly home screen

    The nice thing about the "Home Screen" is, you can long press on anything you don't want and drag it to the waste corner and it's gone.

    Want a lot of widgets and shortcuts? Xoom DOES.
    Want absolutely nothing on the home screen? Xoom DOES that too.

    Yes it may use a touch more power but you have to admit, desktop widgets makes access to important information very convenient.

  1. nofollow

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Aspect Ratio and Portability

    I was at CES. The Xoom is an impressive device, based on what little I could see/experience with it, and also from what I've seen online.

    I think, though, that widescreen tablets aren't going to catch on. There's a reason Apple's laptops are widescreen, and its iPad not. They chose the aspect ratio that would give it a more natural carry appeal--something familiar to us all, similar to paper folders, magazines, etc.

    One-handing a widescreen tablet in landscape isn't where it's at. Though I've seen most standing iPad users choosing portrait orientation (when standing), there are still a fair bunch that use landscape mode (even when standing). Widescreen screens in portrait might give more vertical real estate, but it looks unnatural to most. Widescreen in landscape with a tablet this size...I don't think so.

    I think you're going to see Android tablets migrating away from widescreen configurations. They may still need to do work on multi-tasking and some other iPad things, but, with respect to form factor (and, more specifically, the screen's aspect ratio, and, thus, the tablet's shape), Apple got it right.

  1. samirsshah

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Any way you slice it

    if your tablet does not cost less than an iPad (2), it is not going to sell. You may have more memory, 3G, whatever, whatever. Instead of giving 32 GB to users in a Wi-Fi model and charging them $600, Motorola should have given 16 GB and charged $450.

    I am a fan of Android but it has to compete with price, that is their main USP. Not everybody can be a premium player and that too not all the time (see Sony).

    Droids had subsidy protection, Xooms are going alone.

  1. charlituna

    Joined: Dec 1969


    disabled wifi??

    I might have been tempted to try out the Xoom but I have to have a device that has the option for 3g. However I might not need that option for a while, but wifi I would use right away.

    Being forced to sign up for 3g just to activate wifi is a huge WTF in my book.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Ultimate Ears Megaboom Bluetooth Speaker

Ultimate Ears (now owned by Logitech) has found great success in the marketplace with its "Boom" series of Bluetooth speakers, a mod ...

Kinivo URBN Premium Bluetooth Headphones

We love music, and we're willing to bet that you do, too. If you're like us, you probably spend a good portion of your time wearing ...

Jamstik+ MIDI Controller

For a long time the MIDI world has been dominated by keyboard-inspired controllers. Times are changing however, and we are slowly star ...


Most Commented