toggle

AAPL Stock: 431.77 ( -0.23 )

http://www.macnn.com/articles/11/02/08/ceo.said.to.be.distanced.from.process/

Jobs' former mansion slated for demolition

updated 09:35 am EST, Tue February 8, 2011

 

CEO said to be distanced from process


Demolition of Jackling House -- the historic Woodside, California mansion owned by Apple CEO Steve Jobs -- could start sometime next month, a report says. "We have been working with Mr. Jobs' representatives for the last few months, and we are very close to the point where the permit will be physically issued at the end of this week or the beginning of next week," notes Woodside's town manager, Susan George. Jobs won a nine-year battle to demolish the mansion in August after a preservationist group, Uphold Our Heritage, gave up on the fight to save it. The house was designed for copper baron Daniel Jackling by noted architect George Washington Smith, in the Spanish colonial revival style.

Jobs bought the mansion in 1983 during the first phase of Apple popularity, and lived in it for about 10 years. It has been mostly vacant since, suffering slow decay. In 2005 Jobs told the Woodside Town Council that he had actually bought the house with the intention of leveling it, as he considered it "poorly built." The CEO has long expressed an interest in replacing Jackling House with a smaller, more modern home.

Notably, George reveals that Jobs "has not been intimately involved in the front line" of the project. "I know he keeps in very close contact with his representative on this," she comments. The executive is currently on an indefinite medical leave, which could have ramifications for both his future level of involvement and use of the cleared real estate.

In present plans, a new home would sit at the end of a private drive. Jobs' attitude towards Jackling House has been severely criticized, for instance described as "demolition by neglect" by preservationists. George mentions that some artifacts and decorative elements will be saved from the house and sent to museums, or else sent to other homes designed by Smith that might need them.

[Photo courtesy of Jonathan Haeber]




by MacNN Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :

 Steve Jobs, California, Apple
toggle

Comments

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -2

    um

    It's not his 'former mansion'. It's still his house. So it's one of his current mansions.

  1. jwdsail

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2000

    +3

    Only people that "won" were the lawyers...

    A book about this could be titled, "Only people that "won" were the lawyers...".. or "A tale of 3 un-moveable objects"...

    If Jobs and the preservation group had been able to compromise, say split the cost of re-locating the structure in order to preserve it, each side likely would have ended up spending half of what their lawyers charged, and the building would have survived..

    Sadly, no one seems to have been willing to "Think Different"..

  1. facebook_Justin

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Feb 2011

    +1

    comment title

    Still don't believe that in modern America, where you "own" property, you have to deal with people telling you what you can and cant do with it, and succeeding! Land of the FREE? Where you can own property? Yea, as long as groups of nutjobs approve of what's on it that is! Very happy to hear Jobs won, I hope he destroys everything on that property so the scumwads don't get a single floor tile from the place!

  1. fashizzle

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2003

    0

    Space laser

    Nuke it from space. It's the only way to be sure.

  1. ilovestevejobs

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2007

    -7

    I hope Jobs will be in it

    when it gets demolished

  1. SwissMac

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2006

    +1

    Poor headline...

    It's not a former mansion - it still is a mansion (until it's knocked down).

  1. TheSnarkmeister

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2007

    -2

    What's good for the Goose...

    There are fewer than a few thousand people on the entire planet who are allowed to truly own real estate. Just try not paying taxes to the guy controlling the government guns and see how long they let you keep your house? If you buy something and it isn't yours forever to do with exactly as you please, no matter what anyone else thinks, so long as you do no infringe on anyone else's rights, than you do no own the property -- you are merely renting it, albeit on a very long leasehold. Of course, one could similarly argue that no one actually owns their iPhone by the same logic, not when you can't use it with any service company of your choosing.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Logitech FabricSkin Keyboard Folio for iPad

Since the fourth-generation iPad didn't evolve much over its predecessor, the market for iPad accessories has remained somewhat static ...

Huawei Ascend Mate

The Huawei Ascend Mate is a phone that fits the screen-size gap between the 4 to 5-inch smartphone and the seven-inch or more tablet, ...

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

toggle

Most Commented