toggle

AAPL Stock: 121.3 ( -1.07 )

Printed from http://www.macnn.com

Apple, Google, more in late talks to settle poaching suit

updated 09:10 pm EDT, Thu September 16, 2010

DOJ talks to Apple, Google, Intel in poaching deal

Several technology companies are near the end of talks with the Department of Justice to settle and avoid an investigation into claims of anti-competitive hiring deals, insiders said tonight [sub. required]. Apple, Adobe, Google, Intel, Intuit and Pixar are all hoping to avoid an antitrust case and will potentially halt any pacts they have to avoid poaching each other's employees. The WSJ noted that some of the firms are more willing to settle than others, but didn't say which.

Some have said that they haven't put total halts on hiring between each other and only prevented unsolicited attempts. Others, like IBM and Microsoft, have already gone on record as being excluded from the investigation. Unofficially, these are believed to have essential deals with other companies that would need anti-poaching deals, while those left were going beyond safe limits.

Those more resistant to the prospects of a deal have argued that they need the guarantees of employee security to work together on projects. Teamwork between technology companies has been a staple of the San Francisco Bay Area, but until now anti-poaching practices haven't been subject to significant scrutiny by the US government.

The DOJ has countered by claiming that truces between companies hurt employees by preventing them from moving to a better or higher-paying job. The ability to recruit directly is important even if the employee doesn't leave, since a worker can use a job offer as a bargaining chip for higher pay or better working conditions at an existing position.

Reasons for the truces have varied, but the Apple and Google deal is widely known to have stemmed from the early collaboration the two had on services for the iPhone. The appearance of Android has created a rift between the two, but the policy is suspected of having carried on to avoid any further tension.




by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. tdellos

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    Priorities

    I am all for fair labor practices, but is this really where the DOJ needs to be focusing right now?

    I would hasten to guess that in a down economy, where many people feel they have to take whatever job they can get, that there are much worse labor abuses than this.

    The people these types of agreements cover (engineers, designers, project managers) aren't the ones most needing government protection right now. They are well-educated and affluent and can probably look after themselves just fine.

    Again, I'm all for companies being held accountable for unfair labor practices, I just feel like there are big resources being spent by the government here that almost certainly could be better spent helping out employees of places like Wal-Mart or Target or McDonald's get fair treatment in the workplace.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook

toggle

Most Popular

Advertisement

Recent Reviews

HP 14-x030nr 14-inch Chromebook

If you're like us, chances are you've come to realize that you need the ability to access the Internet on the go. Also, you've prob ...

15-inch MacBook Pro with Force Touch

Apple's 15-inch Retina MacBook Pro continues to be a popular notebook with professional users and prosumers looking for the ultimate ...

Typo keyboard for iPad

Following numerous legal shenanigans between Typo -- a company founded in part by Ryan Seacrest -- and the clear object of his physica ...

toggle

Most Commented