toggle

AAPL Stock: 509.46 ( 0 )

Marketing company settles with FTC over shill iTunes reviews

updated 09:55 pm EDT, Thu August 26, 2010

Commission demands removal of reviews


Marketing company Reverb Communications has reportedly settled with the Federal Trade Commission over accusations of shill reviews for App Store titles. The FTC charged Reverb with engaging in deceptive advertising after employees posted positive reviews of iPhone games. The reviews did not contain any disclosure that the authors were actually hired by the marketing company to represent the apps.

The settlement requires Reverb and executive Tracie Snitker to remove all of the shill reviews, according to a New York Times report. The FTC has also prohibited the company from following the same course of action for any future products and services that lack proper disclosure.

The Reverb dispute marks the first time the Commission has enforced its new guidelines for Internet endorsements. The rules apply to bloggers and other entities that represent or review products through social networking services or websites.

“We hope that this case will show advertisers that they have to be transparent in their practices and help guide other ad agencies,” said FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection lawyer Stacey Ferguson.

The settlement did not include any monetary penalties or a requirement for Reverb to admit guilt.


by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. chas_m

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -1

    Meh

    Its a pity this did not include a large monetary fine (at least) as a warning to others. The old saw about "make an example of them" may not be totally fair, but it would probably save the FTC having to investigate thousands more cases like this.

    Ironically, by netting such a weak "victory," I wonder if the FTC may in fact have sent the opposite signal to what was intended: that posting shill reviews won't actually get you in much trouble, so its worth doing till you get caught.

  1. lkrupp

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2001

    +1

    Shill, anonymous, all the same...

    Anyone who relies on or takes any stock in online user reviews is incredibly naive. Most user reviews, especially those on sites like Cnet, are obviously made by shills, fanboys, haters, or all three. The only example needed is the iPhone in 2007. The day the iPhone was announced, yet shipped months later, there were hundreds of negative user "reviews" on Cnet. The iPhone was not available anywhere but that didn't stop the reviews. These "users" wrote as if they were holding the product in their hands.

    User reviews, as well as user trouble reports, are completely useless without context.

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Re: Shill

    The day the iPhone was announced, yet shipped months later, there were hundreds of negative user "reviews" on Cnet. The iPhone was not available anywhere but that didn't stop the reviews. These "users" wrote as if they were holding the product in their hands.

    And there were just as many positive reviews talking about this untouched and barely seen device was sent from heaven and the perfect phone and computer.

    Even these days, it is hard to find an objective review of an iPhone. Lovers tend to overlook the faults. Haters highlight them and overlook the strengths.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

X-Rite ColorMunki Photo

Color calibration is the art of tweaking your monitor so that the colors represented on screen better match real life and your printer ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed