toggle

AAPL Stock: 106.98 ( -0.36 )

Printed from http://www.macnn.com

Swiss government rejects iPhone trademark application

updated 08:50 pm EDT, Thu April 1, 2010

iPhone described as a non-distinctive trademark

Switzerland's Federal Administrative Court has upheld an earlier rejection of Apple's trademark application for the term "iPhone," according to Managing IP. The Trademark Office originally denied the application last summer, claiming the "i" distinction could be interpreted as a generic term for "Internet phone" or "information phone."

Apple appealed the initial decision with the Administrative Court, arguing that "iPhone" still represents an original word, and the letter "i" can have different meanings than Internet or information. The company also requested equal treatment with several other registrations it considers comparable to the iPhone filing.

The court admitted that "i" can have various interpretations, although it will likely be viewed as an obvious descriptive reference to a telephone with Internet or information functions. The single letter was not deemed sufficient to establish the distinctiveness of the mark.

Apple has appealed the recent ruling, which may be reviewed by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court.




by MacNN Staff

POST TOOLS:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. Fast iBook

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +7

    Great cheese......

    Great cheese, weird laws & legal standards.

    - A

  1. dliup

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +2

    LOL

    Some people there haven't seen the news in the past 3 years.

  1. peter02l

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +1

    "i" distinction could be interpreted as "Internet"

    It could also be interpreted with "imbecile".

  1. MizuInOz

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +6

    "i"nteresting the bias

    Switzerland has some very unique IP laws... such as you can download ANYTHING from the net (movies, music, etc) without restriction and share it with you family and friends. No recourse.

    BUT the patent laws are very specific. The better way to go is to file a European Union Patent (which covers Switzerland) but has different criteria and Switzerland must comply.

    (I have been reviewing IP laws for a technology I have developed)

    It has nothing to do with some of the other comments. Maybe you may want to venture outside of the USA on occasion.

    Cheers from Oz.

  1. Kees

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    i think

    i prefer this to being able to patent basically anything and everything. (you know, like creative patenting 'side-scrolling hierarchical menus in MP3 players')
    I'm pretty sure people will know an Apple iPhone from an X iPhone by now, so what's the big deal anyway?

  1. nomster

    Joined: Dec 1969

    -1

    nomster

    so the next big thing in Switzerland will be the Nokia iPhone? Lucky it's a small population or could lead to lots of legal wrangling if there was a more sizeable market to fight over.

  1. Roehlstation

    Joined: Dec 1969

    -1

    iKnow

    the "i" distinction could be interpreted as a generic term for "Internet phone" or "information phone."

    Perhaps if you've been living under a rock for the past 4 years.

    The term "Swiss Army" could be interpreted as an Army of Swiss as well.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Sound Blaster Roar Bluetooth speaker

There could very well be a new king of the hill for Bluetooth speakers, with Sound Blaster's recent entry into the marketplace. Bring ...

Kenu Airframe Plus

Simple, stylish and effective, the Kenu Airframe + portable car mount is the latest addition to Kenu's lineup. Released earlier this ...

Plantronics Rig Surround 7.1 headset

Trying to capture the true soundscape of video games can be a daunting task. Looking to surround-sound home theater options, users hav ...

toggle

Most Commented