toggle

AAPL Stock: 101.05 ( + 0.19 )

Printed from http://www.macnn.com

RIAA labels 'forced' Apple to make iTunes LP: sources

updated 08:50 am EST, Tue March 9, 2010

Studios wanted iTunes LP, got little sales

The creation of iTunes LP was largely the result of major label pressure on Apple, a series of telling leaks has revealed. Music industry contacts claim that the 'deluxe' albums were a necessary part of the same deal that also forced variable song pricing in exchange for an all DRM-free catalog. The RIAA member labels, not Apple, wanted to resuscitate album sales and thought the bundle of special features would achieve the goal.

People aware of the projects, however, have told GigaOM that iTunes LP has had mixed results at best. Since it was launched, the format has only grown to about 29 titles, almost half of which are holdovers from the September launch. Apple went so far as to pay for the productions itself, handing out as much as $60,000 per album to a contractor. The cost is high enough that one contributor doubts any other iTunes LPs would follow if it had to pay a similar amount itself, although added marketing from Apple compensated for the high initial cost.

The iPad has done little to spark interest in the format even though it should be ideally suited to the format, the music business workers said. Many would instead prefer to offer iPhone/iPad/iPod apps, which can not only show many of the same features as iTunes LP but can include live content and other features beyond the initial album.

As such, many industry insiders liken the format to a movie-enhanced physical album launch, such as enhanced CDs from the 1990s or bundled DVDs from this past decade. The format is a bonus for dedicated fans but does little to change the mainstream, which often doesn't care enough about most artists to pay extra for an album and still prefers to buy the better tracks individually.

Apple has often been singled out by major labels for special treatment as its dominance of digital music, especially in the US, has made them wary of either giving too much control to iTunes or doing anything that would jeopardize its role as the most profitable online music store. Universal and likely other labels are known to have deliberately withheld DRM-free music from iTunes until Apple agreed to variable pricing, even when they had been more willing to offer DRM-free support to services like Amazon MP3 and Napster.

The iPod-friendly music store has also been home to a number of other minor experiments meant to boost multi-track sales, such as "digital 45s" that recreate the heyday of vinyl singles with B-sides.




by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. elroth

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +2

    comment title

    The vast majority of music I buy is CDs, for the lossless music. I very much prefer to buy albums over singles - I guess part of the reason is the music I like is by "album" artists, not the pop stuff.

    Even so, if iTunes music were lossless, I would still not buy iTunes LPs. It's just not an interesting concept to me.

  1. charlituna

    Joined: Dec 1969

    -4

    this is not new news

    the whole LP thing was revealed months ago. pretty much the same time as the variable pricing.

  1. JulesLt

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +3

    Triple gatefold vinyl

    It's one of those formats that falls between two camps - the kind of people attracted to album extras, are exactly the people who will pay for the 3 CD box set with lyric booklet, etc.

    Most people don't want to look at something while listening to music - the advantage of music over video or reading, is that you can do something while listening to it.

    Where it may start to take off is once Adobe or Apple produce reasonably cheap authoring tools, with an equivalent of iDVD at the low end, up to more complex Pro tooling, which would allow smaller labels and artists to do interesting things, similar to how physical packaging is often more innovative at smaller labels.

    The key to album sales though is to simply make them a bargain compared to buying tracks separately. (I do worry about people who only buy tracks that they like / like after 30 seconds of preview - obviously they've never had things grow on them. On the other hand, if your experience is 2 good tracks and a load of filler, than will put you off).

  1. testudo

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +3

    Re: not news

    Well, the fact that it hasn't caught on is news, considering the way Apple touted it on release day. I guess someone figured out that the number of people who actually read things like liner notes, or the other cruft added in there, are very small and isn't worth the expense to make.

  1. bigpoppa206

    Joined: Dec 1969

    -1

    Why is the RIAA even mentioned?

    This was unnecessary.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Autodesk Smoke 2015

Since May of this year, Autodesk has been shipping the highly anticipated update to its high-end post-production video editing suite, ...

Crucial MX100 256GB SATA-3 SSD

While the price-per-gigabyte ratio for magnetic platter-based hard drives can't be beat, the speed that a SSD brings to the table for ...

Narrative Clip

With the advent of social media technology, people have been searching for new ways to share the events of their daily lives -- be it ...

toggle

Most Commented