AAPL Stock: 126.41 ( -2.13 )

Printed from

MacNN Review: PhotoTrackr Mini DPL900

updated 07:30 pm EST, Thu February 25, 2010

GPS Receiver matches waypoints to camera timestamp

MacNN has reviewed the GiSTEQ PhotoTrackr DPL900, a small GPS device that is bundled with software to allow users to simply and quickly add location information to digital photos. After carrying both the DPL900 and a digital camera on a photo shoot, the GPS device matches the timestamp of the user's digital camera after recording where the user was over the same time period. It captures waypoints, rather than tracking the location every second.

The included software is a rebranded version of JetPhoto, which supports GeoTagging, basic cropping and editing and Flickr uploads. The software does not integrate with iPhoto, requiring users to manually drag images into iPhoto after adding GPS info.

PhotoTrackr requires Mac OS X 10.3.9 or later, but if you want to tag and use RAW files you must upgrade to PhotoTrackr Pro, which is a $20 upgrade. The unit itself is $70.

by MacNN Staff



  1. facebook_Kristopher

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Feb 2010



    Why can't we just get digital cameras with GPS chips built-in? The market should be flooded with this feature by now. Who wants to carry yet another device?

  1. danviento

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Why not? Here's why:

    Note, we do have some cameras that allow GPS to be built-in. There are even hot-shoe attachments for DSLRs that let your camera include the geotag directly in the RAW's metadata.

    However, you should note that the sending and receiving from satellites can be a real drain on batteries, and the radio requires you to enlarge your product. Compact point'n'shoot cameras would have to have a larger form factor. DSLR users would have to sacrifice battery life, something that comes as a premium depending on how many photos you take and how far you range from a power source.

    If you really want to geocode your photos, there have been ways to do it for years now. I've been using a fairly nice, very sensitive, and relatively inexpensive GPS logger, and then using 3rd party programs like HoudahGeo to tag images already in my Aperture library. This way, there's no 3rd-party media management, just a tool to work with the system that's already in place.

    Geotagging, as of now, is still a niche practice, so there hasn't been a large market for building it into cameras. Now that Apple has full-fledged adoption of the feature, you can bet that there will be more users picking up on it, and a market to develop useful applications in-camera. Cheers.

  1. testudo

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Re: Why?

    Cost. Battery life. Nuff said.

  1. Scott_R

    Joined: Dec 1969



    Can the PhotoTrackr software simply tag the photos without loading them into anything--that is, leave them where they are while adding the geotags, and then the user can load them into iPhoto or whatever?

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Brother HL-L8250CDN Color Laser Printer

When it comes to selecting a printer, it's not exactly something most people put a lot of thought into. Printers are often touted as ...

Moshi iVisor AG and XT for iPad Air 2

Have you ever tried to put in a screen protector that relies on static to cling to the screen? How many bubbles and wrinkles does it h ...

OmniPlan (OS X, iOS)

We reviewed the Omni Group's most famous Mac software, a To Do app called OmniFocus, back in June 2014, and we were impressed. Some o ...


Most Commented