toggle

AAPL Stock: 101.18 ( + 1.07 )

Printed from http://www.macnn.com

iPad's A4 processor carrying $1 billion pricetag?

updated 01:00 pm EST, Mon February 22, 2010

Modest dip into Apple's cash reserves

The A4 processor at the core of the iPad may have cost Apple as much as $1 billion to develop, says the New York Times. The newspaper notes that Apple is just one of several companies turning to ARM-based chip designs, including NVIDIA and Qualcomm. Even though the companies are contracting out their manufacturing to third-party sources, the billion-dollar ballpark for each company's work remains.

Adding a first-party factory into the equation can raise costs as high as $3 billion, the Times adds. The rush to produce ARM chips is believed to be related to the limitations of Intel's Atom processor. While common in netbooks, Atom hardware can also cost more than an ARM design, and simultaneously consume more power. Battery life is a particular concern for Apple, which has designed the iPad to both read books and watch video. It should in theory have a 10-hour life for functions like video.




by MacNN Staff

POST TOOLS:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. WiseWeasel

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +14

    BS

    The Times pulled that number out of their arse. They said the cost to develop a CPU "from scratch" is typically around $1B. That's not what Apple did, however. Apple has instead licensed the ARM CPU, they purchased a chip design company (PA Semi) which already had CPU designs in the works, and they basically licensed components like graphics processors, memory controllers, and other I/O components and integrated them into a System On a Chip (SOC) design. This is a far cry from actually developing a new CPU from scratch. I'd be surprised if Apple spent half as much, and that's including the $278M they spent to buy PA Semi. The actual figure is probably closer to a third of the Times' guesstimate including this acquisition.

  1. Colonel Panik

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +8

    WiseWeasel is right $1B is baloney --

    Ashlee Vance is generally very good at this stuff, but this time I think he got some bad data.

    This sounds like scaremongering from Intel et. al. $1B for the development of a new chip is certainly possible, but there are lots of companies building SOCs from scratch (including the CPU) for way less than $100M a throw. Tilera, Cavium, and others do this all the time.

    The key is to have a team that is focused on building the chip, not on defending it on some larger corporate road-map. Small teams, focused efforts, clear market goals. $100M is within range for an SOC design, and for $250M or so, you could really do some risky things to bring the schedule in.

    --- In case you can't tell, I'm a chip designer....

  1. AlenShapiro

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +11

    Hand Waving...

    Continuing the theme of (ahem) "hand waving" in this article, I would like to propose that Apple take the chip set to the next level and call it "LEG". Subsequent designs can then be said to cost more than an ARM and a LEG!

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

ActvContent Sync Smartband

Smartbands of all sorts are hitting the market. Some build on the buzz around fitness trackers, while others offer simpler features fo ...

RocketStor 6324L Thunderbolt 2 eSATA bridge

Like it or not, the shift to Thunderbolt is underway. The connection is extremely flexible, allowing for video and data to co-habitate ...

Patriot Stellar Boost XT 64GB USB 3.0 drive

A vast selection of USB memory sticks means that consumers can often find exactly the size drive they need in a configuration that can ...

toggle

Most Commented