toggle

AAPL Stock: 509.46 ( + 6.86 )

Apple blocking public access to iPad shipping records

updated 01:45 pm EST, Thu February 18, 2010

Reinforces extreme secrecy


Apple is currently preventing access to bills of lading and other import information related to the iPad, a US data protection company claims. Trade Privacy notes that such information is usually available through the Freedom of Information Act; Apple is, in fact, said to be the only major electronics company imposing such secrecy. "Similar companies like Microsoft, Sony and Google continue to import with their product data exposed to the public," Trade Privacy asserts in a report serving as marketing.

The firm argues that denial of public access is a means of countering business intelligence groups like Panjiva and ImportGenius. Such outfits collect data from US Customs, then produce research documents that can be sold to a company's rivals. This makes it possible to learn which products are being made, how many units are being produced and when they might arrive in North America.

For Apple the secrecy may also be a way of preserving the "surprise" factor it counts on for product launches. ImportGenius data was used by the media to predict the timing of the iPhone 3G, and Trade Privacy suggests that it was this that led Apple to enforce much stricter information control. The efforts have been so intense that they may have indirectly led to a Foxconn worker's suicide.


by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. c4rlob

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2009

    +10

    irresponsible article

    I think it's severely irresponsible to ever report that a suicide "may have" been caused by something without legitimate source stating so. And even in that case the source should be cited. Either report with certainty that a suicide is "suspected by authorities" or drop it.

    Comment buried. Show
  1. Constable Odo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2007

    -27

    Why would anyone even care about

    how many iPads are shipped?

    From what I've heard so far, the iPad is going to be the most massive failure this side of the Hindenburg blimp. Nobody in the world wants a tablet. Every past tablet in the world has failed. It doesn't fit in a pocket and no real man wants to carry a murse to put it in. A tablet supposedly falls into a computing category that can't possibly exist. The most damning thing about the iPad is that it's made by Apple and Steve Jobs controlled it's design. The iPad has become the most talked about and most reviled device that hasn't even begun to ship. It has already been claimed as the device that will ruin both eBooks and the publishing industry.

  1. charlituna

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2009

    +5

    public shipping records

    would be asking for theft. at various points. And I don't buy this whole illegal action business. I hirely doubt that there's any law that says that a company has to report when and what is shipping, outside of customs forms, which are probably not public information either.

  1. stainless

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2005

    +12

    Constable Odo- spreading Mis-information

    Constable Odo,

    Please state your source of information... I am putting together a business plan for the iPad and everyone in the medical field is so excited they can hardly contain themselves. Right now they lug around a full size laptop and they need to set it down somewhere to get information from it... The few that we spoke with that have tablets hate the fact they are slow. When ask about expansion, ram, etc., here is the FACTS; Doctor, Nurses, Admin does not care about this, the general statement is, "Does it work, fast, safe and maintenance free.". When asked about Multitasking, most of them said, "I need to do my job, I'm not gaming, chatting, etc, while handling patient information. I do one task at a time, as long as it save my data, is it light weight, and worry free, that is my concerns." These are direct quotes from Doctors, Nurses, Administration. Can I provide my sources, YES, but only to the investors involved... can you?

    I love all of the stupid cool-aid drinking geeks who somehow thinks that if they can't control something 100% then it's going to be a failure. I think a virus free environment with a RTOS is considerably more important then being able to tweak a button to look, "cool, look what I did!"

    NERDS GO HOME!

  1. 319please

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2006

    +7

    Press Trying To Keep The SUICIDE Meme Alive

    It's interesting how many outlets/articles are continuing to explicitly or implicitly posit the notion that somehow Apple's product secrecy led to the SUICIDE of a Chinese factory worker.

    Why is the media so titillated by this? Have they nothing better to report on?

  1. byRyan

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2007

    +2

    crazy theories

    While we are all calling it a suicide, I still like to think of it as a mafia style killing made to look like a suicide.

    If we really want to talk about irresponsible journalism, that last line should read: "The efforts have been so intense that Foxconn may have killed a worker and made it look like suicide to appease Apple bloodthirsty demands. Also, there has been speculation of a memo from Steve Jobs saying 'Death to all who oppose me, and make it painful if they leak any info.'

    Sources of that alleged memo are difficult to track down as a potential source of that leak was found beheaded in the desert in another alleged case of suicide."

  1. malax

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2006

    +8

    Strange article

    If I were a CEO of a tech company reading this, I would forward it to my general council and ask why we aren't keeping our import data secret as well. Or I'd just try to hire the guy at Apple that figured out how to do this. Well done, Apple.

  1. Geoduck

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2010

    +5

    Freedom of Info Act?

    The Freedom of Information Act applies to Government Records. If they are records belonging to the government then Apple could not restrict them. If they are Apple's own internal records then it's up to them to release them or not and the FOIA is irrelevant.

    Unless I'm missing something this sounds more like sour grapes from someone that wants to make a profit off of someone else's work.

  1. Gepard

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2000

    +6

    MACNN's Journalism

    Here is a definition:

    The Freedom of Information Act, commonly known as the FOIA, was enacted by Congress in 1966 to give the American public greater access to the Federal Government's records.

    Also, Macnn mentions the so called "Foxconn worker's suicide" the 3rd time for the last couple of days in their articles for no reason.

    Well, macnn.com is becoming a really bad piece of reading. Bad journalism with a combination of yellow paint. It used to be a pleasure to read this site in the past. Not anymore, unfortunately.

    Time to find a better place to read the Apple related news!

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

X-Rite ColorMunki Photo

Color calibration is the art of tweaking your monitor so that the colors represented on screen better match real life and your printer ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed