toggle

AAPL Stock: 493.42 ( + 0.25 )

FCC worries about iPad bandwidth congestion

updated 09:45 am EST, Fri February 5, 2010

Gov't. body raises spectre of AOL outages


The iPad could potentially cause serious havoc for US data networks, say people writing on behalf of the Federal Communications Commission. Updating an official blog, Phil Bellaria, director of scenario planning for the Omnibus Broadband Initiative, and John Leibovitz -- deputy chief of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau -- observe that the device may put extra strain on already problematic networks. "With the iPad pointing to even greater demand for mobile broadband on the horizon," the pair write, "we must ensure that network congestion doesn't choke off a service that consumers clearly find so appealing or frustrate mobile broadband's ability to keep us competitive in the global broadband economy."

The situation could become serious enough, say Bellaria and Leibovitz, that it might echo the problems of AOL dial-up in 1996 and 1997. After opening up to unlimited use, AOL's servers collapsed under the load, preventing people from getting any sort of consistent access for several months.

Although avoiding direct insinuations, the post makes clear references to AT&T, which will be the only initial American carrier to support the 3G iPad. The carrier has had enough trouble supporting iPhone data traffic, particularly in New York City in San Francisco. It is feared that the iPad, designed to be treated more like a computer, could overwhelm some AT&T nodes.

AT&T has refused to comment on the threat. Apple has also been silent, but did mention during a Q1 results call that AT&T is "making plans to address" the overload created by the iPhone.


by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. zooachtiv

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 2004

    +8

    The solution is simple..

    FCC should Force Apple to not release the device, and instead mandate Microsoft develop the iPad.. Then there would be no congestion at all..

    ;)

    Happy Friday!!!

  1. MacOS

    Junior Member

    Joined: Aug 2002

    +7

    scare tactic

    Clearly this is a scare tactic meant to justify raising rates. Duh!

  1. obull

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2010

    +4

    The solution is simple..

    Touche!

    :-)

    Same to You!

  1. macjockey

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2004

    +3

    then just forget the 3G version

    then just release the wi-fi version and forget the 3G version

  1. Inkling

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2006

    +12

    Cellular is cellular

    Read the seminal documents on cellular radio, and you'll see that all this was anticipated over thirty years ago. Not enough spectrum was, after all, the key problem with pre-cellular telephony.

    The answer was the cell, hence the name cellular. As demand grew, the expected answer wasn't to go to the FCC for more spectrum. It was to shrink the size of each cell, lowering the antenna height and transmit power, so that spectrum could reused more times. We've now reached the point in many cities where we shouldn't be looking up to see cellular antennas high on poles or multi-story buildings every mile or two. In built-up areas we should be looking across and seeing them every block or two, perhaps mounted on the side of power poles. Dead spots should be filled by micro-cells, not higher towers and more power. The same should be true of many commercial buildings. Each floor or two should have its own outward looking micro-cell rather than trying to force a signal in through thick exterior walls from a cellular tower a mile away.

    It's not the perfect answer. No answer is. But as almost everything moves to wireless, it's the only way we're going to avoid intense, nasty, and expensive competition for every bit of spectrum above 1 GHz.

    --a former cellular engineer




  1. Constable Odo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2007

    +3

    These people are unbelievable...

    Not one iPad has been sold yet and it's already being projected to bring down carriers from over-congestion. What about all those netbook users that supposedly have all their devices tethered to 3G networks? What about the claims that hardly any consumers will even buy iPads? They way they're talking is like people will be just be dumping their smartphones and using the iPad. How can they start predicting problems from a device that nobody knows for certain how well it will sell or if most consumers will even buy the 3G model. I'm sure there is a trend for there being more users on 3G networks in the future, but why single out the iPad for that.

  1. zooachtiv

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 2004

    +1

    Re: These people are unbelievable...

    "I'm sure there is a trend for there being more users on 3G networks in the future, but why single out the iPad for that."

    Its called History and the iPhone..

  1. mtnrunner2

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2009

    -8

    The FCC should get out of the way

    The FCC has no right to worry about bandwidth, because it should the h*** out of the way and let it expand.

    Various government branches have been messing up the communications industry for years: enabling monopolies, then breaking them up, telling companies what they can and can't do, the proposed "net neutrality" (which would amount to hijacking private bandwidth), yadda yadda yadda.

    There is never any shortage of companies wanting to make a profit on the massive demand for Internet services (or anything else). The problem is the restrictions on businesses trying to do it.

    U.S. Government: YOU are the roadblock. Duh.

    Jeff Montgomery
    http://funwithgravity.blogspot.com

  1. jamck1977

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2010

    +3

    microcells

    Maybe Apple and AT&T could work together and develep microcells built into every iMac or Airport Extreme base Station...

  1. danviento

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Dec 2005

    +3

    You're Missing the Point

    What the h*** does the FCC have to do with this? You can bet your a** that AT&T thought of this too. If they fail, so does their reputation, and Apple may not be so exclusive with them if their service is poor enough to hurt their hardware sales. The market takes care of issues like this- it's in the parties' best interest to be ready, or build in controls to prevent catastrophes.

    As Jeff says, agencies like the FCC haven't done anything helpful in our memory, so why give them a say to fail again? They can't really "do" anything anyway.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

X-Rite ColorMunki Photo

Color calibration is the art of tweaking your monitor so that the colors represented on screen better match real life and your printer ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed