toggle

AAPL Stock: 113.29 ( + 0.37 )

Printed from http://www.macnn.com

Intel readying six-core, 3.33GHz Core i7

updated 03:20 pm EST, Tue December 15, 2009

Core i7-980X hints at 6-core Xeon too

Intel's first mainstream six-core processor should be fast across the board, a leak late Monday has given away. Built on the 32 nanometer Westmere process and part of the Gulftown architecture, the Core i7-980X will keep the Core i7 badge despite its two extra cores. At the same time, it will also maintain a high clock speed and should run at 3.33GHz, or the same speed as the current quad-core leader.

Level 3 ache has appropriately increased from 8MB to 12MB to cover the additional cores; the processor will likely be reserved for larger and higher-end desktops, however, as it should consume a high 130W of power at its thermal peak and is likely to cost the usual $999 bulk price Intel charges for every Extreme Edition processor. Intel is expected to ship the processor late in winter, most likely in March.

A second new Core i7 processor, the i7-930, is also believed due as soon as February. It will have only four cores and clock in at 2.8GHz with 8MB of L3 cache. Scaling back will nonetheless let Intel charge just $284 per chip in large batches.

The i7-980X is likely to be a strong indicator of Intel's plans for six-core Xeons using the same 32nm architecture and process; typically, Intel gives these similar or higher clock speeds as well as support for faster and error-corrected memory needed for workstations and servers.






by MacNN Staff

POST TOOLS:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. iphonerulez

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    Fantasizing over a dual six-core Mac Pro...

    I know I won't be able to afford one, but it's nice to think about how much performance it would have especially if there was a high-end multi-core GPU installed and Grand Central Dispatch tying everything together.

  1. lolcat789

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    Big deal

    Nobody uses 8 cores much less 12. This whole 'more cores is better' thing totally ignores the fact that most software doesn't use more than 4. If it does use more than four, any non-professional would likely be using a render farm and a pair of FireGL/Quadro's anyhow.

    Not to mention that extreme branding means $1,000 a piece... I'll wait for Thuban, thank you.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook

toggle

Most Popular

Advertisement

Recent Reviews

ZTE Spro 2 Smart Projector

Home theaters are becoming more and more accessible these days, but maybe you've been a bit wary about buying a home projector. And h ...

MSI Geforce GTX 970 100ME

When Nvidia announced a new line of video cards in September 2014, many people thought things would continue to be business as usual i ...

Wren V5US Wireless Sound System

If you're a music fanatic, chances are you are, by extension, a bit fanatical about what you listen to your music on. If you're like ...

toggle

Most Commented