toggle

AAPL Stock: 446.2 ( + 6.54 )

http://www.macnn.com/articles/09/12/04/plaintiff.shows.long.record.of.successful.cases/

Suit charges Apple with violating camera patents

updated 05:10 pm EST, Fri December 4, 2009

 

Plaintiff shows long record of successful cases


Apple has been hit with a lawsuit over its use of digital camera technology, according to reports. The case is being processed through the US District Court for Delaware, and specifically charges Apple with violating four different patents in the manufacture of the iPhone. The plaintiff, St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, is demanding damage compensation and a jury trial.

The lawsuit is only the latest in a string from St. Clair, connected to the same patents. A 2001 verdict against Sony was valued at $25 million, while a 2003 suit versus Canon garnered $34 million. Suits have subsequently been filed against a number of electronics companies, including camera makers like Nikon, Minolta, Fuji, Casio, Olympus and Kyocera. General electronics companies targeted have included Samsung, Panasonic, Nokia, HP, Kodak, LG, Motorola, Palm and Research in Motion.

In many circumstances, licensing agreements have been arranged. Apple may be likely to jump to a settlement, given precedent and a desire to avoid an expensive legal battle.


by MacNN Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :

 cameras, lawsuits, Apple
toggle

Comments

  1. Fast iBook

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2003

    -1

    Prior art.

    iSight anyone? I have the 2.0 version, the 3.0 is built into the iPhone etc.

    - A

  1. JeffHarris

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 1999

    +4

    Can't innovate? Litigate!

    So, they've been suing everyone in the industry.
    Who's next?

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -2

    Re: Can't innovate

    And yet here they've been litigating for 8 years and been found in the right several times.

  1. Fast iBook

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2003

    -1

    Um...

    Why minus 2? Apple has cameras in its macbook & imac lines, as well as previously producing a stand alone camera, the iPhone simply doesn't have a mic which works as an integrated unit with the camera, all prior art. They also once made a digital still camera years ago...

    - A

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -3

    Re: Um...

    And how does 5 year old prior art not violate 10 year old patent?

    And there's no links to the patents to know what they are bein sued over.

  1. Fast iBook

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2003

    +1

    The prior art....

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_QuickTake

    - A

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to overstate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming decline ...

toggle

Most Commented