AAPL Stock: 110.38 ( + 0.8 )

Printed from

Court denies motion to include Snow Leopard in Psystar suit

updated 06:55 pm EDT, Thu September 24, 2009

Separate case now headed to Florida court

US District Court Judge William Alsup has denied Apple's motion to include Snow Leopard in its case against Psystar. Apple initially argued to keep the updated operating system out of the case by "relentlessly objecting to discovery on Snow Leopard," Alsup writes. The company was successful at keeping the issue separate, as the update was released after the discovery period had come to a close.

Psystar then filed a separate antitrust case, aimed solely at Snow Leopard, but in the US District Court in the Southern District of Florida. Apple only tried to reverse its initial position after the second action was filed.

"If Snow Leopard was within the scope of its own complaint herein, as it now suggests, then Apple should have welcomed discovery thereon rather than, as it did, object to discovery directed at Snow Leopard and effectively taking Snow Leopard out of the case," the judge asserts. "The problem is one largely of Apple's own making."

Psystar contends that it should have the right to buy Snow Leopard and install it on non-Apple hardware. The clone maker's attorneys argue that Apple illegally links the operating systems to its hardware, resulting in a monopolization of the Mac OS X computer market.

Judge Alsup denied Apple's motion without prejudice, which leaves the decision open to be reinterpreted by the Florida court. If Judge Hoeveler feels that the Snow Leopard proceedings should be transferred back to Alsup's court, the original case will be modified to accommodate another discovery period.

by MacNN Staff





  1. PRoth

    Joined: Dec 1969


    About stuff that goes on too long...

    I know, I know... Psystar should bid to buy the Pheonix Coyotes. They seem to be having trouble with cats, so maybe they'd have better luck with dogs. Bah dum bum, tsh. Hello? Anyone?

  1. FrankMtl

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Way too long

    For a company that was on the brink of bankruptcy they are sure fighting the long fight. Makes me think there might be some truth to backers with lots of $$$$.
    PRoth how's the veal? ;)

  1. malax

    Joined: Dec 1969



    This really is a soap opera. Now Apple will be on the defensive in FL (briefly) where's it's accused of anti-trust violation while on the offensive in California over copyright and contract issues. Hope it gets resolved before Clouded Leopard or we'll see a case in Texas too.

  1. msuper69

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Psystar = looters

    So Apple does all the work to create OS X while Psystar does nothing.

    Who is the bad guy here?

    If Psystar were to win this suit, then up is down and black is white.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Polk Hinge Wireless headphones

Polk, a company well-established in the audio market, recently released a new set of headphones aimed at the lifestyle market. The Hin ...

Blue Yeti Studio

Despite being very familiar with Blue Microphones' lower-end products -- we've long recommended the company's Snowball line of mics ...

ZTE Spro 2 Smart Projector

Home theaters are becoming more and more accessible these days, but maybe you've been a bit wary about buying a home projector. And h ...


Most Commented